Evidence for genetic isolation and local adaptation in the field cricket Gryllus campestris
Tom Tregenza,Rolando Rodríguez-Muñoz,Jelle J Boonekamp,Paul E Hopwood,Jesper Givskov Sørensen,Jesper Bechsgaard,Virginia Settepani,Vinayaka Hegde,Callum Waldie,Emma May,Caleb Peters,Zinnia Pennington,Paola Leone,Emil M Munk,Samuel T E Greenrod,Joe Gosling,Harry Coles,Rhodri Gruffydd,Loris Capria,Laura Potter,Trine Bilde
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jeb.13911
Abstract:Understanding how species can thrive in a range of environments is a central challenge for evolutionary ecology. There is strong evidence for local adaptation along large-scale ecological clines in insects. However, potential adaptation among neighbouring populations differing in their environment has been studied much less. We used RAD sequencing to quantify genetic divergence and clustering of ten populations of the field cricket Gryllus campestris in the Cantabrian Mountains of northern Spain, and an outgroup on the inland plain. Our populations were chosen to represent replicate high and low altitude habitats. We identified genetic clusters that include both high and low altitude populations indicating that the two habitat types do not hold ancestrally distinct lineages. Using common-garden rearing experiments to remove environmental effects, we found evidence for differences between high and low altitude populations in physiological and life-history traits. As predicted by the local adaptation hypothesis, crickets with parents from cooler (high altitude) populations recovered from periods of extreme cooling more rapidly than those with parents from warmer (low altitude) populations. Growth rates also differed between offspring from high and low altitude populations. However, contrary to our prediction that crickets from high altitudes would grow faster, the most striking difference was that at high temperatures, growth was fastest in individuals from low altitudes. Our findings reveal that populations a few tens of kilometres apart have independently evolved adaptations to their environment. This suggests that local adaptation in a range of traits may be commonplace even in mobile invertebrates at scales of a small fraction of species' distributions.