How risky is a second allogeneic stem cell transplantation?

Olaf Penack,Mouad Abouqateb,Christophe Peczynski,William Boreland,Nicolaus Kröger,Robert Zeiser,Fabio Ciceri,Thomas Schroeder,Peter Dreger,Jakob Passweg,Johannes Schetelig,Matthias Stelljes,Igor Wolfgang Blau,Georg-Nikolaus Franke,Katarina Riesner,Hélène Schoemans,Ivan Moiseev,Zinaida Peric
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41375-024-02318-3
2024-06-25
Leukemia
Abstract:There is no consensus on second allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT) indications in patients with hematologic malignancies relapsing after a first alloSCT. In historic publications, a very high non-relapse mortality (NRM) has been described, arguing against performing a second alloSCT. We analysed the outcome of 3356 second alloSCTs performed 2011–21 following a hematologic malignancy relapse. Outcomes at two years after second alloSCT were: NRM 22%, relapse incidence 50%, overall survival 38%, and progression-free survival 28%. Key risk factors for increased NRM were: older age, low performance score, high disease-risk-index, early relapse after the first alloSCT, unrelated/haploidentical donor, and GVHD before second alloSCT. Any type of GVHD after first alloSCT was also important risk factor for acute GVHD and chronic GVHD after second alloSCT. There was a preferential use of a different donor (80%) at second alloSCT from first alloSCT. However, in multivariate analysis, the use of the same alloSCT donor for second alloSCT vs. a different donor was not associated with any of the survival or GVHD endpoints. We show considerably improved outcome as compared to historic reports. These current data support a wider use of second alloSCT and provide risk factors for NRM that need to be considered.
oncology,hematology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?