Abstract:Cover crops have been reported as one of the most effective practices to increase soil organic carbon (SOC) for agroecosystems. Impacts of cover crops on SOC change vary depending on soil properties, climate, and management practices, but it remains unclear how these controlling factors affect SOC benefits from cover crops, as well as which management practices can maximize SOC benefits. To address these questions, we used an advanced process‐based agroecosystem model, ecosys, to assess the impacts of winter cover cropping on SOC accumulation under different environmental and management conditions. We aimed to answer the following questions: (1) To what extent do cover crops benefit SOC accumulation, and how do SOC benefits from cover crops vary with different factors (i.e., initial soil properties, cover crop types, climate during the cover crop growth period, and cover crop planting and terminating time)? (2) How can we enhance SOC benefits from cover crops under different cover crop management options? Specifically, we first calibrated and validated the ecosys model at two long‐term field experiment sites with SOC measurements in Illinois. We then applied the ecosys model to six cover crop field experiment sites spanning across Illinois to assess the impacts of different factors on SOC accumulation. Our modeling results revealed the following findings: (1) Growing cover crops can bring SOC benefits by 0.33±0.06 MgC ha‐1 yr‐1 in six cover crop field experiment sites across Illinois, and the SOC benefits are species‐specific to legume and non‐legume cover crops. (2) Initial SOC stock and clay contents had overall small influences on SOC benefits from cover crops. During the cover crop growth period (i.e., winter and spring in the US Midwest), high temperature increased SOC benefits from cover crops, while the impacts from larger precipitation on SOC benefits varied field by field. (3) The SOC benefits from cover crops can be maximized by optimizing cover crop management practices (e.g., selecting cover crop types and controlling cover crop growth period) for the U.S. Midwestern maize‐soybean rotation system. Finally, we discussed the economic and policy implications of adopting cover crops in the U.S. Midwest, including that current economic incentives to grow cover crops may not be sufficient to cover costs. This study systematically assessed cover crop impacts for SOC change in the US Midwest context, while also demonstrating that the ecosys model, with rigorous validation using field experiment data, can be an effective tool to guide the adaptive management of cover crops and quantify SOC benefits from cover crops. The study thus provides practical tools and insights for practitioners and policy‐makers to design cover crop related government agricultural policies and incentive programs for farmers and agri‐food related industries.

Impacts of an increase in federal assistance for cover cropping: Evidence from the Environmental Quality Incentives Program

Financial incentive programs and farm diversification with cover crops: Assessing opportunities and challenges

The Social Factors Influencing Cover Crop Adoption in the Midwest: A Controlled Comparison

Recent cover crop adoption is associated with small maize and soybean yield losses in the United States

Agronomic and economic implications of cover crop and phosphorus fertilizer management practices for water quality improvement

What Works for Agricultural Nonpoint Source Pollution Reduction? Evidence from the Corn Belt in the United States

An Empirical Analysis of Acreage Effects of Participation in the Federal Crop Insurance Program

Evaluation of long-term impact of cereal rye as a winter cover crop in Illinois

Cover crop management practices to promote soil health and climate adaptation: Grappling with varied success from farmer and researcher observations

Effect of Wheat Cover Crop and Split Nitrogen Application on Corn Yield and Nitrogen Use Efficiency

Impact of cover crop on corn–soybean productivity and soil water dynamics under different seasonal rainfall patterns

Effect of Cover Crop on Farm Profitability and Risk in the Southern High Plains

Assessing long‐term impacts of cover crops on soil organic carbon in the central U.S. Midwestern agroecosystems

Impact Evaluation of a Payments for Ecosystem Services Program on Vegetation Quantity and Quality Restoration in Inner Mongolia.

Demonstrating Short-Term Impacts of Grazing and Cover Crops on Soil Health and Economic Benefits in an Integrated Crop-Livestock System in South Dakota

Conservation plans and soil and water conservation practice use: Evidence from Iowa

Agricultural Beneficial Management Practices: A Synthesis of Co-benefits, Tradeoffs, and Co-costs between Crop Yield and Non-provisioning Ecosystem Services

Integrated Assessments Of Payments For Ecosystem Services Programs

Quantifying cover crop effects on soil health and productivity

A critical review of the impacts of cover crops on nitrogen leaching, net greenhouse gas balance and crop productivity

Impacts of varying agricultural intensification on crop yield and groundwater resources: comparison of the North China Plain and US High Plains