Abstract:DNA lesions trigger DNA damage checkpoint (DDC) signaling which arrests cell cycle progression and promotes DNA damage repair. In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, phosphorylation of histone H2A (γH2A, equivalent to γH2AX in mammals) is an early chromatin mark induced by DNA damage that is recognized by a group of DDC and DNA repair factors. We find that γH2A negatively regulates the G2/M checkpoint in response to the genotoxin camptothecin, which is a DNA topoisomerase I poison. γH2A also suppresses DDC signaling induced by the DNA alkylating agent methyl methanesulfonate. These results differ from prior findings, which demonstrate positive or no roles of γH2A in DDC in response to other DNA damaging agents such as phleomycin and ionizing radiation, which suggest that γH2A has DNA damage-specific effects on DDC signaling. We also find evidence supporting the notion that γH2A regulates DDC signaling by mediating the competitive recruitment of the DDC mediator Rad9 and the DNA repair factor Rtt107 to DNA lesions. We propose that γH2A/γH2AX serves to create a dynamic balance between DDC and DNA repair that is influenced by the nature of DNA damage.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem this paper attempts to address is: how γH2A (or its mammalian homolog γH2AX) specifically regulates the DNA damage checkpoint signaling pathway (DDC) in yeast *Saccharomyces cerevisiae*. Specifically, the study found that γH2A negatively regulates the G2/M checkpoint signaling pathway in response to certain DNA-damaging agents, such as the topoisomerase I inhibitor camptothecin (CPT) and methyl methanesulfonate (MMS), while this effect is not evident in other types of DNA damage (such as ionizing radiation and radiomimetic agents). ### Main Issues: 1. **The role of γH2A under different DNA damage conditions**: - The study found that γH2A negatively regulates the DNA damage checkpoint signaling pathway (particularly the G2/M checkpoint) in response to CPT and MMS, whereas it does not have this effect or has a positive regulatory effect in response to other DNA-damaging agents (such as ionizing radiation and radiomimetic agents). 2. **How γH2A affects the DNA damage checkpoint signaling pathway**: - The authors propose that γH2A dynamically balances the DNA damage checkpoint signaling pathway and the DNA repair process by competitively recruiting the DNA damage checkpoint mediator Rad9 and the DNA repair factor Rtt107 to the DNA damage sites. ### Specific Research Content: - **Experimental Design**: - The authors used various yeast mutants, including the hta-S129A mutant that cannot phosphorylate H2A-S129 and the fun30∆ mutant lacking Fun30, to study the role of γH2A in the DNA damage checkpoint signaling pathway. - Through Western blot analysis and growth phenotype testing, they assessed the phosphorylation levels of Rad53 and Rad9 and cell cycle progression in different mutants under CPT treatment. - **Main Findings**: - γH2A negatively regulates the G2/M checkpoint signaling pathway in response to CPT, leading to reduced phosphorylation levels of Rad53 and Rad9. - In the hta-S129A mutant, the CPT-induced G2/M checkpoint is enhanced, indicating that γH2A normally inhibits this checkpoint. - The role of γH2A is independent of Fun30, and in the absence of Rtt107, the negative regulatory effect of γH2A disappears, supporting the model that γH2A regulates the DNA damage checkpoint signaling pathway through competitive binding with Rtt107. ### Conclusion: - The authors propose that γH2A dynamically balances the DNA damage checkpoint signaling pathway and the DNA repair process by competitively recruiting Rad9 and Rtt107 under different DNA damage conditions, thereby affecting the cellular response to DNA damage. This mechanism helps to understand the complexity and diversity of the DNA damage response.

γH2A/γH2AX Mediates DNA Damage-Specific Control of Checkpoint Signaling in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

H2AX post-translational modifications in the ionizing radiation response and homologous recombination.

Distinct roles of chromatin-associated proteins MDC1 and 53BP1 in mammalian double-strand break repair.

Control of sister chromatid recombination by histone H2AX.

Double Strand Break Repair Functions of Histone H2AX

Regulation of the DNA Damage Response on Male Meiotic Sex Chromosomes.

Delineation of the role of chromatin assembly and the Rtt101Mms1 E3 ubiquitin ligase in DNA damage checkpoint recovery in budding yeast

H2AX facilitates classical non-homologous end joining at the expense of limited nucleotide loss at repair junctions.

A critical role for histone H2AX in recruitment of repair factors to nuclear foci after DNA damage

Rad3ATR Decorates Critical Chromosomal Domains with γH2A to Protect Genome Integrity during S-Phase in Fission Yeast

Chromosome structure due to phospho-mimetic H2A modulates DDR through increased chromatin mobility

Detection of Histone H2AX Phosphorylation on Ser‐139 as an Indicator of DNA Damage

Buried territories: heterochromatic response to DNA double-strand breaks.

Dephosphorylation of γ-H2AX by WIP1: An important homeostatic regulatory event in DNA repair and cell cycle control

The Dynamic Alterations of H2AX Complex During DNA Repair Detected by a Proteomic Approach Reveal the Critical Roles of Ca(2+)/calmodulin in the Ionizing Radiation-Induced Cell Cycle Arrest.

Prolonged Cell Cycle Arrest in Response to DNA damage in Yeast Requires the Maintenance of DNA Damage Signaling and the Spindle Assembly Checkpoint

Dynamics of Rad9 Chromatin Binding and Checkpoint Function Are Mediated by Its Dimerization and Are Cell Cycle–Regulated by CDK1 Activity

Phosphorylation-Dependent Interactions Between Crb2 and Chk1 Are Essential for Dna Damage Checkpoint

Uniform Widespread Nuclear Phosphorylation of Histone H2AX Is an Indicator of Lethal DNA Replication Stress

Chromatin dynamics and the repair of DNA double strand breaks.

Activation of the DNA Damage Checkpoint in Yeast Lacking the Histone Chaperone Anti-Silencing Function 1