Abstract:INTRODUCTION: External fixators (EF) are widely employed for pediatric tibial shaft fractures, being a prevalent choice in clinical practice. However, they are associated with numerous complications, such as loss of reduction, delayed union, and nonunion. An alternative approach involves the use of Ilizarov external fixators (IEF), which have been documented in the treatment of tibial shaft fractures in various studies. This study endeavors to retrospectively compare the clinical outcomes of EF and IEF in the treatment of pediatric tibial shaft fractures.METHODS: The study retrospectively examined patients aged 5-14 years who underwent treatment for tibial shaft fractures at our institute between January 2017 and January 2023. These individuals were subsequently classified into EF and IEF groups. Exclusions comprised patients presenting with pathological fracture, neuromuscular disorder, metabolic disease, prior tibial fracture or instrumentation, and polytrauma. Additionally, individuals with a follow-up duration of more than 12 months or incomplete medical records were excluded.RESULTS: A total of 45 patients were divided into two groups: the EF group, comprising 24 patients (18 males, 6 females), and the IEF group, consisting of 21 patients (17 males, 4 females). The two groups exhibited no statistically significant differences in terms of sex, age, body weight, time from injury to surgery, AO classification, or concomitant injuries. There were two cases of nonunion in the EF group. Radiological union occurred more rapidly in the IEF group (7.8 ± 0.4 weeks) than in the EF group (9.3 ± 1.1 weeks) (P < 0.05). The mean hospitalization duration differed significantly between the EF group (6.7 ± 3.4 days) and the IEF group (7.5 ± 1.1 days) (P > 0.05). The mean duration of the operative procedure significantly differed between the IEF group (147.8 ± 24.5 min) and the EF group (77.2 ± 43.9 min) (P < 0.001). A significant difference (P < 0.001) in weight-bearing time was observed between the IEF group (2.6 ± 0.7 weeks) and the EF group (9.9 ± 1.4 weeks). According to the Johner-Wruhs criteria, no significant differences were found between the two groups. A significant difference (P < 0.001) in hospitalization costs was observed between the IEF group (7848.0 ± 262.4 $) and the EF group (5403.0 ± 233.3 $).CONCLUSION: EF is cheaper, quicker and simpler and we need more randomized controlled studies and that this is a pilot study only. Both types of surgery are good choices for children. Nevertheless, the IEF group demonstrates advantages such as early weight-bearing capability and faster fracture healing.

Elastic Stable Intramedullary Nailing Versus Plate Internal Fixation for Pediatric Diaphyseal Femur Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Intramedullary Nailing Versus Plating for Extra-Articular Distal Tibial Metaphyseal Fracture: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Improved anterolateral approach to treatment of terminal femoral fractures

Efficacy comparison between intramedullary nail fixation and plate fixation in distal tibia fractures: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

The fibular intramedullary nail versus plate fixation for ankle fractures in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Comparative Efficacy of Interlocking Intramedullary Nails and Percutaneous Plate Implantation in the Treatment of Femoral Shaft Fractures: A Meta-Analysis

Elastic stable intramedullary nailing in paediatric diaphyseal forearm fractures – a retrospective analysis of 201 cases

Intramedullary nail fixation versus open reduction and internal fixation for treatment of adult diaphyseal forearm fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Intramedullary nail versus locking plate for treatment of proximal humeral fractures: A meta-analysis based on 1384 individuals.

Which fixation produces the best outcome for distal femoral fractures? Meta-analysis and systematic review of retrograde nailing versus distal femoral plating in 2432 patients and 33 studies

Modified elastic intramedullary nail internal fixation for distal tibial metaphyseal junction fracture

Evaluation of Intramedullary Fixation for Pediatric Femoral Shaft Fractures in Developing Countries

Comparison of intramedullary nailing fixation and percutaneous locked plating fixation for the treatment of proximal tibial fractures: A meta-analysis

Finite element analysis of intramedullary nailing and double locking plate for treating extra-articular proximal tibial fractures

Operative choice for subtrochanteric femoral fracture in school-aged children: Triple elastic stable intramedullary nail versus locking plate

Internal Fixation Treatments for Intertrochanteric Fracture：A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

Intramedullary nail versus dynamic compression plate fixation in treating humeral shaft fractures: grading the evidence through a meta-analysis.

External fixator versus Ilizarov external fixator for pediatric tibial shaft fractures: A retrospective comparative study

Effect of minimally invasive percutaneous plates versus interlocking intramedullary nailing in tibial shaft treatment for fractures in adults: A meta-analysis

Effect of Elastic Stable Intramedullary Nailing on Treatment of the Femoral Shaft Fractures in Children

Retrograde tibial intramedullary nail versus minimally invasive locking plate for extra-articular distal tibial fractures: a comparative and retrospective study