Abstract:Work on comparing cities in terms of their transport energy consumption and CO2 emissions in the urban passenger transport sector has rarely been done using detailed travel activity data that takes into account city level differences in terms of economic development, population, and urban form. A personal activity based approach is necessary to better reflect travel behavior change results from different social, economic, urban form, technical, and transportation policy situations in the future. The present study extends the existing activity, modal share, energy intensity, fuel/carbon intensity (ASIF) modeling framework by disaggregating travel activity into key structural components and city-specific factois for 288 prefectural level cities in China. Testable econometric modeling systems were built to link mode split and mode specific travel distances with local economic and urban form characteristics in four different population sizes and two urban form types, based on 187 travel surveys in 108 Chinese cities in the past two decades. Scenarios of energy use and carbon emissions between 2010 (baseline) and 2050 were developed. Results showed that in 2010 urban passenger road transport in China generated 396 Mt CO2 emissions and per capita urban passenger transport energy use increased as city size expanded. By 2030, under business as usual scenario assumptions, energy use in the urban passenger transport sector comprised 23.2 Mt of gasoline, 1.72 Mt of diesel, 3.36 billion M-3 of natural gas, and 0.62 billion kWh of electricity. While national policies targeting travel behavior change have been shown to mitigate emissions to some extent, urban transport policies targeted at specific spatial and temporal drivers of energy demand and emissions may be more effective in meeting policy goals. Short-term policies that promote car-pooling and ride sharing and medium-term policies that increase the cost of driving and promote public transport (such as transit oriented development, walkable neighborhood design, and parking pricing/restraint in city centers) help stabilize carbon emissions over the long term. However, the decision of building polycentric cities might have less significant impact on mitigating urban passenger transport in big cities. Moreover, large-scale promotion of electric vehicles should be designed from a long-term perspective rather than from a short-term one to achieve balanced carbon emissions in regard to the decarbonization process of electricity generation in China.

Co-benefits of transport demand reductions from compact urban development in Chinese cities

Co-drivers of Air Pollutant and CO2 Emissions from On-Road Transportation in China 2010-202

Scenarios of demographic distributional aspects of health co-benefits from decarbonising urban transport

Co-benefits of Reducing CO2 and Air Pollutant Emissions in the Urban Transport Sector: A Case of Guangzhou

Assessing climate/air quality synergies and cost-effectiveness for Beijing transportation: insights into sustainable development

Could Urban Spatial Planning Really Help to Reduce Urban Carbon Emissions? A Case of Hangzhou

Impact Mechanism of Residential Area Patterns Based on Carbon Emission Measurement on Residents’ Travel: A Case Study of Mianyang, China

Urban Cross-Sector Actions for Carbon Mitigation with Local Health Co-Benefits in China

Transport decarbonization in big cities: An integrated environmental co-benefit analysis of vehicles purchases quota-limit and new energy vehicles promotion policy in Beijing

The Implications of and Institutional Barriers to Compact Land Development for Transportation: Evidence from Bejing

Managing Urban Growth to Reduce Motorised Travel in Beijing: One Method of Creating a Low-Carbon City

Future Energy Use and CO2 Emissions of Urban Passenger Transport in China: A Travel Behavior and Urban Form Based Approach

Impacts of urban scale on low-carbon development: evidence from 265 cities in China

New-Type Urbanization on pollution and carbon reduction impact mechanism and co-benefits analysis

Key Factors, Planning Strategy and Policy for Low-Carbon Transport Development in Developing Cities of China

Analysis of the Co-Benefits of Climate Change Mitigation and Air Pollution Reduction in China

Urban Greenhouse Gas Emission Peaking Paths and Embedded Health Co-Benefits: A Multicases Comparison Study in China

Neighborhood-scale Urban Form, Travel Behavior, and CO2 Emissions in Beijing: Implications for Low-Carbon Urban Planning

Quantifying the spillover elasticities of urban built environment configurations on the adjacent traffic CO2 emissions in mainland China

Mitigation synergy and policy implications in urban transport sector: A case study of Xiamen, China

Uncovering the key mechanisms of how deep decarbonization benefits air pollution alleviation in China