Sustainable Grassland-Management Systems and Their Effects on the Physicochemical Properties of Soil

Urška Lisec,Maja Prevolnik Povše,Anastazija Gselman,Branko Kramberger
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13060838
2024-03-14
Plants
Abstract:Grassland covers approximately 17.4% of Europe's land area, stores about 20% of the world's soil carbon and has the potential to sequester carbon. With the help of sustainable management systems, grasslands could reduce greenhouse gases and act as a terrestrial sink for atmospheric CO2. In this study, we will investigate the effect of grassland management (cutting, grazing, and a combination of the two) and soil depth (0–10, 10–20, 20–30 cm) on the physical (volumetric water content—VWC, bulk density—BD, porosity—POR, mass consisting of coarse fragments—FC) and chemical properties of soil (organic carbon—SOC, inorganic carbon—SIC, total carbon—STC, total nitrogen—STN, organic matter—SOM, C/N ratio, pH) in Central European lowlands. The management system affected BD, SOC and STN and tended to affect VWC and STC in the first soil depth only. Grazing and the combined system stored greater amounts of STN, SOC and STC and had higher BDs at the surface (0–10 cm) compared to the cutting system. Most soil properties were influenced by soil depth, with C/N ratio and BD increasing and SOC, STC, STN, SOM, VWC and POR decreasing with depth. Our study highlights an opportunity for grassland users to improve soil quality, reduce fossil fuel usage and improve animal welfare through their management systems and argues that systems such as grazing and the combined system should be promoted to mitigate climate change.
plant sciences
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
### Problems Addressed by the Paper This paper primarily explores the impact of grassland management practices (grazing, mowing, and their combination) on soil physical and chemical properties. Specifically, the study focuses on the following issues: 1. **Impact of Different Grassland Management Practices on Soil Physical Properties**: - The study examined the effects of different management practices (grazing, mowing, and combined management) and different soil depths (0-10 cm, 10-20 cm, 20-30 cm) on soil physical properties (volumetric water content, bulk density, porosity, and coarse particle mass fraction). - The results indicated that management practices significantly affected the bulk density of surface soil, and in the surface layer (0-10 cm), the bulk density in the grazing system was significantly higher than in the mowing system. 2. **Impact of Different Grassland Management Practices on Soil Chemical Properties**: - The study explored the effects of different management practices on soil organic carbon (SOC), inorganic carbon (SIC), total carbon (STC), total nitrogen (STN), organic matter (SOM), carbon-nitrogen ratio (C/N), and pH value. - The results showed that in the surface layer (0-10 cm), the STN content in the grazing system was significantly higher than in the mowing system. Additionally, the contents of SOC, STC, and STN were also higher in the grazing system. 3. **Relationship Between Soil Physical and Chemical Properties**: - The study analyzed the correlation between soil physical properties (such as bulk density, porosity, and volumetric water content) and chemical properties (such as SOC, STN, etc.). - The results found that bulk density was significantly negatively correlated with porosity, and SOC was significantly negatively correlated with bulk density, especially in grazing and combined management systems. In summary, this study aims to reveal the impact of different grassland management practices on soil physical and chemical properties by comparison, thereby providing scientific evidence for optimizing grassland management strategies, improving soil quality, and promoting carbon sequestration.