A machine learning approach to stratify patients with hypermobile Ehlers‐Danlos syndrome/hypermobility spectrum disorders according to disorders of gut brain interaction, comorbidities and quality of life

Anisa Choudhary,Asma Fikree,James K. Ruffle,Kazuya Takahashi,Olafur S. Palsson,Imran Aziz,Qasim Aziz
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/nmo.14957
2024-11-21
Neurogastroenterology & Motility
Abstract:Within hypermobile ehlers‐danlos syndrome (hEDS)/hypermobility spectrum disorder (HSD), clusters exist with a high prevalence of functional foregut disorders and irritable bowel syndrome. These clusters have a higher prevalence of psychological disorders, dysautonomia and poorer quality of life compared with hEDS/HSD alone. Background A high prevalence of disorders of gut‐brain interaction (DGBI) exist in patients with hypermobile Ehlers‐Danlos Syndrome (hEDS) and hypermobility spectrum disorders (HSD). However, it is unknown if clusters of hEDS/HSD patients exist which overlap with different DGBIs and whether this overlap influences presence of comorbidities and quality of life. We aimed to study these knowledge gaps. Methods A prospectively collected hEDS/HSD cohort of 1044 individuals were studied. We undertook Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection‐enabled (UMAP) dimension reduction to create a representation of nonlinear interactions between hEDS/HSD and DGBIs, from which individuals were stratified into clusters. Somatization, Postural Tachycardia Syndrome (PoTS), autonomic symptoms, psychological factors and quality of life were statistically compared between clusters. Key Results The mean age of patients was 40 ± 13.2 years; 87.8% were female. Patients segregated into three clusters: Cluster 0 (n = 466): hEDS/HSD+ functional foregut disorders (FFD) + irritable bowel syndrome (IBS); Cluster 1 (n = 180): hEDS/HSD+ IBS and Cluster 2 (n = 337): hEDS/HSD alone. In cluster 0, we demonstrated increased somatization (p <0.0001), anxiety (p <0.0001), depression (p <0.0001), PoTS prevalence (p = 0.003), autonomic symptoms (p <0.0001) and reduced quality of life (p <0.0001) compared to cluster 2. Cluster 0 had greater comorbidity burden than cluster 1. Conclusions Within hEDS/HSD, subgroups exist with a high prevalence of FFD and IBS. These subgroups have a higher prevalence of psychological disorders, dysautonomia and poorer quality of life compared with hEDS/HSD alone. Further research should focus on healthcare utilization, management and prognosis in hEDS/HSD and DGBI overlap.
gastroenterology & hepatology,neurosciences,clinical neurology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?