Establishing the clinical relevance of grade A post‐hepatectomy liver failure

Dominic J. Vitello,Dhavan Shah,Bona Ko,Brian C. Brajcich,Xane D. Peters,Ryan P. Merkow,Henry A. Pitt,David J. Bentrem
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.27570
2024-01-17
Journal of Surgical Oncology
Abstract:Introduction The International Study Group of Liver Surgery's criteria stratifies post‐hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) into grades A, B, and C. The clinical significance of these grades has not been fully established. Methods The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) hepatectomy‐targeted database was analyzed. Outcomes between patients without PHLF, with grade A PHLF, and grade B or C PHLF were compared. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression were performed. Results Six thousand two hundred seventy‐four adults undergoing elective major hepatectomy were included in the analysis. The incidence of grade A PHLF was 4.3% and grade B or C was 5.3%. Mortality was similar between patients without PHLF (1.2%) and with grade A PHLF (1.1%), but higher in those with grades B or C PHLF (25.4%). Overall morbidities rates were 19.3%, 41.7%, and 72.8% in patients without PHLF, with grade A PHLF, and with grade B or C PHLF, respectively (p
oncology,surgery
What problem does this paper attempt to address?