Abstract:IntroductionSince 2007, observations reveal that low- and middle-income countries (LICs and LMICs) experience similar surgical access and safety issues, though the etiology of these challenges varies by country. The collective voice of surveys completed to date has pushed the agenda for the inclusion of safe surgery and anesthesia within global health discussions. Comparison of four countries across the world shows similar basic progress as well as ongoing surgical and anesthesia needs in resource-challenged countries. By studying these common needs, a comprehensive plan to provide infrastructure and personnel support can work in multiple austere settings.MethodsA standardized survey tool published, designed, and developed initially by the Harvard Humanitarian Initiative and modified at Vanderbilt University was completed in Guatemala, Guyana, Laos, and Mozambique. The survey assessed eight key areas of essential surgical care: access to and availability of surgical services, access to human resources, essential infrastructure (including access to water, electricity, sanitation, blood products, and essential medicines including supplemental oxygen), surgical outcomes, operating room information and procedures, equipment, International Organization, and Non-Government Organization provision of surgical care. These results were compared and contrasted to evaluate resource challenges and assets in each country.ResultsA total of 49 hospitals were surveyed in this comparison cohort. The results reveal common needs for emergency and essential surgery in each country, but some differences in human and capital resources exist. While minimal resources exist, all surgical sites provided running water, electricity, and oxygen—assets not seen in previous surveys as recent as 2011.ConclusionThe most basic needs to provide essential surgery are now present in LICs and LMICs. Many more resources are needed to ensure access to safe surgery and anesthesia. The next steps to provide essential surgery must include common solutions for access to surgery and anesthesia, and an evaluation of patient safety in these endeavors through the perioperative mortality rate.

Series on the Lancet Oncology Commission on Global Cancer Surgery: Introduction—Intent and Content

The Lancet Oncology Commission Global cancer surgery: delivering safe, aff ordable, and timely cancer surgery

Global cancer surgery: delivering safe, affordable, and timely cancer surgery

A review of global cancer burden: Trends, challenges, strategies, and a role for surgeons

GLOBOCAN 2020 Report on Global Cancer Burden: Challenges and Opportunities for Surgical Oncologists

Global Disparities in Surgical Care

Surgery for lung cancer—the Indian scenario

Improving access to safe, quality surgical care for gynecologic cancers through capacity-building interventions in low- and middle-income countries: A scoping review

Evaluating the status of the Lancet Commission on Global Surgery indicators for India

Correction to: Global Forum of Cancer Surgeons: Position Statement to Promote Cancer Surgery Globally

An Overview of Global Neurosurgery

Addressing the Global Burden of Surgical Disease: Proceedings from the 2nd Annual Symposium at the American College of Surgeons

A Global Approach to Improving Penile Cancer Care

Global survey on the surgical management of patients affected by colorectal cancer with synchronous liver metastases: impact of surgical specialty and geographic region

The current landscape of Neurosurgical Oncology in Low-Middle-Income Countries (LMIC): Strategies for the Path forward

Global Surgery System Strengthening: It Is All About the Right Metrics

Global Neurosurgery: A Path Forward Through Health System Strengthening

Evaluating Progress in the Global Surgical Crisis: Contrasting Access to Emergency and Essential Surgery and Safe Anesthesia Around the World

Reshaping the critical role of surgeons in oncology research

Global Neurosurgery: An Overview

Achieving Equity Through Global Neurosurgery Research