Abstract:Objectives This study investigated effects of the different emittance-mode protocols from three light curing units (LCUs): (i) a Laser (Monet); (ii) a quad-wave (PinkWave); (iii) a conventional LED (Elipar S10) on the temperature rise (ΔT) and degree of conversion (DC) when photo-curing fast or conventional bulk-fill resin-based composites (RBC). The aim was to correlate ΔT and DC, and the radiant exposure delivered to RBC specimens. Methods A 3D-printed resin mold of 4 mm depth was filled with two bulk-fill RBCs: Tetric PowerFill® ( fast photo-polymerised composite) ( TPF ) or Tetric EvoCeram® Bulk-Fill ( EVO ). Three LCUs were used: (i) Monet laser for 1 s and 3 s ( MONET-1 s, MONET-3 s ); (ii) PinkWave quad-wave used for 3 s in Boost mode ( PW-3 s ) and for 20 s in standard mode ( PW-20 s ); (iii) Elipar S10 for 5 s ( S10–5 s ) and for 20 s in standard mode ( S10–20 s ). 2-dimensional temperature maps were obtained before, during and for 60 s after the LCU had turned off using a thermal imaging camera. Thermal changes were analysed at five depths: (0, 1, 2, 3, and 4 mm from the top surface of the RBC). The maximum temperature rise ( T max ) and the mean temperature rise ( ΔT ) were determined. Cylindrical-shaped specimens were prepared from each material using a stainless-steel split mold (4 × 4 mm) and light-cured with the same protocols. The DC was measured for 120 s and at 1 h after LCU had turned off using Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR). Data were analysed using Three-way ANOVA, One-way ANOVA, independent t-tests, and Tukey post-hoc tests (p < 0.05). Results Radiant exposures delivered by the various irradiation protocols were between 4.5–30.3 J/cm 2 . Short exposure times from MONET-1 s and PW-3 s delivered the lowest radiant exposures (4.5 and 5.2 J/cm 2 , respectively) and produced the lowest ΔT and DC. The longer exposure times in the standard modes of PW-20 s, S10–20 s, and MONET-3 s produced the highest T max , ΔT, and DC for both composites. The ΔT range among composites at different depths varied significantly (31.7–49.9 °C). DC of TPF ranged between 30–65% and in EVO between 15.3–56%. TPF had higher T max, ΔT for all depths and DC compared to EVO, across the LCU protocols (p < 0.05), except for PW-20 s and MONET-3 s. The coronal part of the restorations (1–2 mm) had the highest ΔT. There was a positive correlation between ΔT and DC at 4-mm depth after 120 s Significance Longer, or standard, exposure times of the LCUs delivered greater radiant exposures and had higher DC and ΔT compared to shorter or high-irradiance protocols. The fast photo-polymerised RBC had comparatively superior thermal and conversion outcomes when it received a high irradiance for a short time (1–5 s) compared to the conventional Bulk-Fill RBC.

Light curing infection control barriers: do some types jeopardize the concept of conventional bulk-fill composites?

Composite Cure and Pulp-Cell Cytotoxicity Associated with LED Curing Lights.

Effect of duration and infection control barriers of light curing unit on hardness of Bulk Fill composite resin

Diversity of short-term DC outcomes in bulk-fill RBCs subjected to a 3 s high-irradiance protocol

Impact of Fast High-Intensity versus Conventional Light-Curing Protocol on Selected Properties of Dental Composites

Mechanical Behaviour of Novel Nanohybrid Resin Composite Using Two Light Cure Systems

The Effect of Bulk Depth and Irradiation Time on the Surface Hardness and Degree of Cure of Bulk-Fill Composites

Thermography and conversion of fast-cure composite photocured with quad-wave and laser curing lights compared to a conventional curing light

The effect of light curing intensity on bulk-fill composite resins: heat generation and chemomechanical properties

Effects of different antibacterial disinfectants on microleakage of bulk-fill composite bonded to different tooth structures

Effects of Light Attenuation through Dental Tissues on Cure Depth of Composite Resins

Microleakage of Class II Bulk-Fill Resin Composite Restorations Cured with Light-Emitting Diode versus Quartz Tungsten-Halogen Light: An In Vitro Study in Human Teeth

Light-curing dental resin-based composites: How it works and how you can make it work

Effects of aging and light-curing unit type on the volume and internal porosity of bulk-fill resin composite restoration

Evaluation of microleakage of class II dental composite resin restorations cured with LED or QTH dental curing light; Blind, Cluster Randomized, In vitro cross sectional study

Influence of Battery Levels in Cordless LED Light-curing Units on Properties of Resin Cement and Glass Fiber Post Retention

The Effects of Intensity, Exposure Time, and Distance of Polymerization Light on Vickers Microhardness and Temperature Rise of Conventional Resin-Based Composite

Influence of increment thickness on dentin bond strength and light transmission of composite base materials

Effects of CAD/CAM restorative materials and thickness on the depth of cure of various light-cured resin composite materials

Dual-cure dental composites: can light curing interfere with conversion?

Effect of Photodynamic Therapy with Four Light-Sensitive Materials on the Bond Strength of Fiber Posts to Root Dentin