Abstract:In the era of globalization, in the face of industrial competition, companies are attempting to instill a culture of Occupational Safety and Health (OSH) as a symbol and image of their existence. However, it is unfortunate that the presence of OSH in the company does not always serve as a barometer of the company's normative compliance with OSH. In practice, the rules governing worker behavior still show varying degrees of permissiveness. The practice of OSH must be accompanied by moral values in order to achieve the desired condition. Therefore, there are two behavioral approaches in OSH communication practices in companies: (1) do the things right, which means following the rules. This does not necessarily resolve OSH problems, as ‘rules’ at the minimum only regulate employee behavior and (2) do the right things, which is moral in nature, which allows workers to act and behave according to their nature because what is outlined in the rules does not always reflect free will, so in the end each worker must find a way to do what’s best. The critical-interpretive approach with phenomenological method in research focuses on the meaning and awareness of OSH caused by communication distortion in the company on workers' behavior towards social reality as something complex, continuously evolving and full of meaning. In the development of Axel Honneth's conceptual dimensions of recognition theory (love, rights and solidarity) has a central role and solution in the distortion of corporate communication, especially in the implementation of OSH programs that emphasize the importance of recognizing worker relationships and developing self-confidence, self-respect and self-esteem, in the context of Good Corporate Governance (GCG) and Governance Risk and Compliance (GRC), recognition theory provides implications for the importance of recognizing workers’ contributions to the goals achieved in the company, thereby increasing workers' dignity and individual values in the company. Without social recognition, OSH will not be able to serve as operational barometer of a start-up company. It will only serve as a framing to protect the company, “as if” it already fulfills its legal obligations towards OSH.

Social value, climate change, and environmental stewardship: Insights from theory and practice. By William Nikolakis, Renata Moura da Veiga, Cham: Springer. 2023. pp. 142. €106.99 (eBook). ISBN: 978‐3‐031‐23145‐2 (eBook)

The Impact of Social Norms on Pro-Environmental Behavior: A Systematic Literature Review of The Role of Culture and Self-Construal

Social norm change: drivers and consequences

The Constructive, Destructive, and Reconstructive Power of Social Norms: Reprise

Impact of Social Desirability and Environmental Awareness on Ecological Behavior among Students

Accounting for Society: Examining the Interplay between Financial Reporting and Social Responsibility

Earth stewardship: Shaping a sustainable future through interacting policy and norm shifts

Understanding the Recognition of Occupational Safety and Health: A Critique of Corporate Culture

The Law's Critical Role in Developing Human-Environment Relationships after COVID-19 Pandemic (A Study of Ecofeminism)

The social psychology of seismic hazard adjustment: re-evaluating the international literature

Developing a Culture of Safety for Sustainable Development and Public Health in Manufacturing Companies—A Case Study

Unraveling the Dark Side of Social Norms-Toward a Research Agenda on the Challenges of Social Norms in Health Communication

Changes in social norms during the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic across 43 countries

Mass behaviour change amid COVID-19: How public health information and social norms explain the transformation

The Nature of Safety Culture: A Survey of the State-of-the-art

Risk, sanctions and norm change: the formation and decay of social distancing norms

Green Organizational Culture, Corporate Social Responsibility Implementation, and Food Safety

The Power and Pitfalls of Social Norms

The Influence of Social Norms on Consumer Behavior: A Meta-Analysis