Impact of Rifaximin Therapy on Ischemia/Reperfusion Injury in Liver Transplantation: A Propensity Score–Matched Analysis
Takahiro Ito,Kojiro Nakamura,Shoichi Kageyama,Islam M. Korayem,Hirofumi Hirao,Kentaro Kadono,Justine Aziz,Stephanie Younan,Joseph DiNorcia,Vatche G. Agopian,Hasan Yersiz,Douglas G. Farmer,Ronald W. Busuttil,Jerzy W. Kupiec‐Weglinski,Fady M. Kaldas
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/lt.25633
2019-11-04
Liver Transplantation
Abstract:IntroductionIntestinal microbiota is thought to play an important role in hepatic ischemia reperfusion injury (IRI) after liver transplantation (LT). Rifaximin, a non‐absorbed antibiotic used to treat encephalopathy exhibits antibacterial activity within the gut. We report the first study examining the impact of pre‐LT rifaximin use on reducing hepatic IRI and inflammatory cell infiltration after LT. MethodsThis retrospective single center study included adult LT recipients from January 2013 through June 2016. Patients were divided into two groups based on duration of rifaximin use before LT: rifaximn (28 days or more), and control (none or within 27 days). Patients receiving other antibiotics within 28 days of LT and re‐LTs were excluded. Outcomes and mRNA expression in the graft were compared by 1:1 propensity score‐matched and multivariate analyses. ResultsOn 1:1 matching (n=39/ group), rifaximin patients had lower levels of postoperative serum transaminases and lower early allograft dysfunction (EAD, 10.3% vs 33.3%, p=0.014). Of the matched patients, 8 patients (n=4/ group) had post reperfusion liver biopsies (approximately 2h post reperfusion) available for mRNA analysis. Expression of CD86, a macrophage marker, and cathepsin G, a neutrophil marker, in the liver were lower in rifaximin patients than controls (0.17 vs 0.25/ GAPDH, p=0.029) and (0.10 vs 0.16/ GAPDH, p=0.029) respectively. 486 patients were included in the multivariate analysis. Rifaximin treatment reduced EAD in all and high MELD (MELD ≥35) patients [CI]: 1.298‐3.382, p‐0.002), while longer cold and warm ischemia time increased EAD in all patients and High MELD patients respectively (OR: 1.052, 95% CI: 1.026‐1.079, p<0.001), (OR: 1.003, 95% CI: 1.002‐1.005, p<0.001). ConclusionThis propensity score‐matched and multivariate analyses suggest a therapeutic role of rifaximin in reducing EAD. Pre‐LT rifaximin administration exerted a protective function against early liver injury, potentially by suppressing inflammatory cell activation in the graft.
gastroenterology & hepatology,surgery,transplantation