Asleep versus awake GPi DBS surgery for Parkinson's disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Jordana Borges C Diniz,Francisco Alfonso Rodriguez Elvir,Laís Silva Santana,Helen Michaela de Oliveira,Anna Laura Lima Larcipretti,Tiago Muniz Vieira de Melo,Douglas Carneiro Barroso,Fernando Cotrim Gomes,Allan Dias Polverini,Vanessa Milanese

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2024.03.033

IF: 2.116

2024-04-12

Journal of Clinical Neuroscience

Abstract:Background Patients with Parkinson's Disease (PD) who receive either asleep image-guided subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (DBS) or the traditional awake technique have comparable motor outcomes. However, there are fewer studies regarding which technique should be chosen for globus pallidus internus (GPi) DBS. This systematic review and meta -analysis aims to compare the accuracy of lead placement and motor outcomes of asleep versus awake GPi DBS PD population. Methods We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane for studies comparing asleep vs. awake GPi DBS lead placement in patients with PD. Outcomes were spatial accuracy of lead placement, measured by radial error between intended and actual location, motor improvement measured using (UPDRS III), and postoperative stimulation parameters. Statistical analysis was performed with Review Manager 5.1.7. and OpenMeta [Analyst]. Results Three studies met inclusion criteria with a total of 247 patients. Asleep DBS was used to treat 192 (77.7 %) patients. Follow-up ranged from 6 to 48 months. Radial error was not statistically different between groups (MD −0.49 mm; 95 % CI −1.0 to 0.02; I 2 = 86 %; p = 0.06), with a tendency for higher target accuracy with the asleep technique. There was no significant difference between groups in change on motor function, as measured by UPDRS III, from pre- to postoperative (MD 8.30 %; 95 % CI −4.78 to 21.37; I 2 = 67 %, p = 0.2). There was a significant difference in postoperative stimulation voltage, with the asleep group requiring less voltage than the awake group (MD −0.27 V; 95 % CI −0.46 to − 0.08; I 2 = 0 %; p = 0.006). Conclusion Our meta-analysis indicates that asleep image-guided GPi DBS presents a statistical tendency suggesting superior target accuracy when compared with the awake standard technique. Differences in change in motor function were not statistically significant between groups.

neurosciences,clinical neurology