Abstract:We calculate the Casimir-Lifshitz force (CLF) between a metallic sphere and a graphene-coated SiO$_2$ plane and compare our finding with the experiment and theory by M. Liu \emph{et al.}, PRL {\bf 126}, 206802 (2021), where a non-local and lossless model for the graphene conductivity (GC) has been used and shown to be compatible with the experimental results. Recently, that conductivity model has been shown to be not correctly regularized [<a class="link-https" data-arxiv-id="2403.02279" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.02279">arXiv:2403.02279</a>], to predict nonphysical results in the non-local regime, and being correct only in its local limit, where its expression is identical to the local Kubo conductivity model (once also losses are introduced). To compare the experimental results with the correctly regularized Kubo theory and to clarify the effective role played by the graphene non-locality and losses in that experiment, we calculated the CLF using three different models for the GC: the correct general non-local Kubo model, the local Kubo model, and the non-regularized and lossless model used by M. Liu \emph{et al.}. For the parameters of the experiment, the predictions for the Casimir-Lifshitz force using the three models are practically identical, implying that, for the experiment, both non-local and lossy effects in the GC are negligible. This explains why the GC model used in M. Liu \emph{et al.} provides results in agreement with the experiment. We find that the experiment cannot distinguish between the Drude and Plasma prescriptions. Our findings are relevant for present and future comparisons with experimental measurement of the Casimir-Lifshitz force involving graphene structures. Indeed, we show that an extremely simple local Kubo model, explicitly depending on Dirac mass, chemical potential, losses and temperature, is largely enough for a totally comprehensive comparison with typical experimental configurations.

Two approaches for describing the Casimir interaction with graphene: density-density correlation function versus polarization tensor

The polarization tensor approach for Casimir effect

Casimir-Polder attraction and repulsion between nanoparticles and graphene in out-of-thermal-equilibrium conditions

The Casimir Force between Two Graphene Sheets: 2D Fresnel Reflection Coefficients, Contributions of Different Polarizations, and the Role of Evanescent Waves

Thermal Casimir and Casimir–Polder interactions in N parallel 2D Dirac materials

Impurities in graphene and their influence on the Casimir interaction

Nonequilibrium Casimir-Polder Interaction Between Nanoparticles and Substrates Coated with Gapped Graphene

On the convergence of the polarization tensor in space-time of three dimensions

Casimir-Polder Force on Atoms or Nanoparticles from the Gapped and Doped Graphene: Asymptotic Behavior at Large Separations

Casimir forces and graphene sheets

Quantum field theoretical framework for the electromagnetic response of graphene and dispersion relations with implications to the Casimir effect

Convergence of the polarization tensor in spacetime of three dimensions

Casimir free energy for massive scalars: a comparative study of various approaches

Nonequilibrium Casimir-Polder Force between Nanoparticles and Graphene-Coated Silica Plate: Combined Effect of the Chemical Potential and Mass Gap

Casimir effect for Dirac lattices

Nonequilibrium Casimir–Polder Force between Nanoparticles and Graphene-Coated Silica Plate: Combined Effect of the Chemical Potential and Mass Gap

Large-Separation Behavior of the Casimir-Polder Force from Real Graphene Sheet Deposited on a Dielectric Substrate

Classical limit of the Casimir interaction for thin films with applications to graphene

Analytic approach to the thermal Casimir force between metal and dielectric

On the spatial dependence of Casimir friction in graphene

Casimir-Lifshitz force with graphene: theory versus experiment, role of spatial non-locality and of losses