Abstract:As a seminal institutional innovation within the framework of Chinese-style modern competition theory, the question of whether the Fair Competition Review System (FCRS) can harness policy dividends and bolster enterprise competitiveness stands as a pivotal concern for accelerating the emergence of new productive forces and fostering a harmonious integration of an "effective government + efficient market." Leveraging data from China's listed manufacturing enterprises spanning the period from 2010 to 2020, this paper undertakes an empirical examination of the impact of competition policy frameworks on the competitiveness of manufacturing enterprises. The FCRS is treated as a quasi-natural experiment, and a difference-in-differences (DID) methodology is employed for analysis. The findings of this paper are as follows: (1) The implementation of the FCRS has been found to effectively augment the competitiveness of manufacturing enterprises by approximately 1.97%, and this fundamental conclusion retains its validity after a battery of robustness tests; (2) The FCRS primarily influences enterprise competitiveness by lowering financing costs, enhancing technological innovation, and mitigating over-investment; (3) Heterogeneity analysis reveals that non-high-tech enterprises and those with lower financing constraints can attain more pronounced effects in promoting enterprise competitiveness through competition policies. Additionally, enterprise size and operational risks also exert an influence on the efficacy of competition policies in enhancing competitiveness; (4) Expanded analysis indicates that competition policies optimize the capital structure of enterprises through "debt reduction" and "capacity enhancement," thereby exploring the viability of analyzing the macro factors that impact enterprise "deleveraging" from the lens of competition policies. The research conclusions presented in this paper carry substantial guiding significance for the government in clarifying the preeminent role of market allocation of resources, promoting the establishment of a unified national market, and orchestrating a coherent fair competition system.

How do ex ante review systems improve firms' labor income shares: Empirical evidence from the fair competition review system

Corporate Endowment Insurance Fee Reduction and Employee Wages:Evidence from China

The Wage Gap Between State And Private Enterprises In China: Counterfactual Analysis Based On Quantile Regression

Effects of CEO Identity on Non-family Managers’ Pay Dispersion in Family Firms: A Social Comparison Perspective

Impact of Financial Regulation on Labor Income Share: Evidence from China

Does Industrial Policy Increase Labor Income Share?

Corporate Governance of Controlling Shareholders and Labor Employment Decisions: Evidence from a Parent Board Reform in China

Administrative monopoly and state-owned enterprise innovation: Evidence from the fair competition review system in China

Can administrative monopoly regulation enhance corporate ESG performance? Evidence from the fair competition review system

The "Supply-Side Reform Policy" and the Share of Labor Income in Enterprises

The External Fairness of CEO’s Emolument, the Nature of Stock Right and Company’s Performance

Competition Policy and Enterprise Competitiveness: Catalyst or Barrier?

Competition policy and labor income share: Evidence from the antitrust policy in China

Shareholder Bargaining Power and Labor Income Share: Evidence from a Quasi-natural Experiment in China

Managerial ownership and labor income share

Power of Competition: Unraveling the Impact of China's Fair Competition Review System Implementation on Firm Innovation

The Disparity in Regions, the Regulation of Emolument, and the Corruption of High-ranking Managers

Does Corporate Governance Enhance Common Interests of Shareholders and Primary Stakeholders?