Search for $η_{c}(2S)\to K^+ K^- η^{\prime}$ decay
BESIII Collaboration,M. Ablikim,M. N. Achasov,P. Adlarson,O. Afedulidis,X. C. Ai,R. Aliberti,A. Amoroso,Q. An,Y. Bai,O. Bakina,I. Balossino,Y. Ban,H.-R. Bao,V. Batozskaya,K. Begzsuren,N. Berger,M. Berlowski,M. Bertani,D. Bettoni,F. Bianchi,E. Bianco,A. Bortone,I. Boyko,R. A. Briere,A. Brueggemann,H. Cai,X. Cai,A. Calcaterra,G. F. Cao,N. Cao,S. A. Cetin,J. F. Chang,G. R. Che,G. Chelkov,C. Chen,C. H. Chen,Chao Chen,G. Chen,H. S. Chen,H. Y. Chen,M. L. Chen,S. J. Chen,S. L. Chen,S. M. Chen,T. Chen,X. R. Chen,X. T. Chen,Y. B. Chen,Y. Q. Chen,Z. J. Chen,Z. Y. Chen,S. K. Choi,G. Cibinetto,F. Cossio,J. J. Cui,H. L. Dai,J. P. Dai,A. Dbeyssi,R. E. de Boer,D. Dedovich,C. Q. Deng,Z. Y. Deng,A. Denig,I. Denysenko,M. Destefanis,F. De Mori,B. Ding,X. X. Ding,Y. Ding,Y. Ding,J. Dong,L. Y. Dong,M. Y. Dong,X. Dong,M. C. Du,S. X. Du,Y. Y. Duan,Z. H. Duan,P. Egorov,Y. H. Fan,J. Fang,J. Fang,S. S. Fang,W. X. Fang,Y. Fang,Y. Q. Fang,R. Farinelli,L. Fava,F. Feldbauer,G. Felici,C. Q. Feng,J. H. Feng,Y. T. Feng,M. Fritsch,C. D. Fu,J. L. Fu,Y. W. Fu,H. Gao,X. B. Gao,et al. (564 additional authors not shown)
2024-07-24
Abstract:Using $(2.712\pm0.014)\times10^{9}$ $\psi(3686)$ events collected with the BESIII detector operating at the BEPCII, we find an evidence of the $\eta_{c}(2S)\to K^+ K^- \eta^{\prime}$ decay with a statistical significance of 3.1$\sigma$. Its decay branching fraction is measured to be $(12.24\pm4.60(\mathrm{stat.})\pm2.37(\mathrm{syst.})\pm4.68(\mathrm{extr.}))\times 10^{-4}$, where the first uncertainty is statistical, the second is systematic, and the third uncertainty is from the branching fraction of the $\psi(3686)\to\gamma\eta_{c}(2S)$ decay. The upper limit on the product branching fraction $B[\psi(3686)\to\gamma\eta_{c}(2S)] \times$ $B[\eta_{c}(2S)\to K^+ K^- \eta^{\prime}]$ is set to be $1.14 \times 10^{-6}$ at $90\%$ confidence level. In addition, the branching fractions of $\chi_{c1}\to K^+ K^- \eta^{\prime}$ and $\chi_{c2}\to K^+ K^- \eta^{\prime}$ are updated to be $(8.47\pm0.09(\mathrm{stat.})\pm0.47(\mathrm{syst.}))\times 10^{-4}$ and $(1.53\pm0.04(\mathrm{stat.})\pm0.08(\mathrm{syst.}))\times 10^{-4}$, respectively. The precision is improved by twofold.
High Energy Physics - Experiment