Abstract:The cultural milieu has a profound influence on employee behaviour in the organisations. In an increasingly diverse workplace and in a more globalised business world, managers, to be effective, need to appreciate behavioural implications of cultural values that employees, organisations, and societies hold. One of the most cited frameworks to understand behaviour of people across the national cultures was proposed by Hofstede (2001). In this paper, we take a look at the behavioural implications in the organisations of power distance (status differences), which is one of the five cultural dimensions in Hofstede's framework. Specifically. we explore the impact of power distance orientation on employee participation, nature of job descriptions, organisational communication and decision-making, discipline and control, deference to senior employees, management development, and organisational structuring and adaptation. We conclude that: (1) employees in a high power distance context are unwilling to participate in decisions and are content with their managers making decisions and giving them instructions, which they follow passively. (2) jobs are narrowly and tightly specified, giving the employees limited discretion. (3) communication takes place vertical downwards, with no or little horizontal communication. Overall communication is anemic. A large communication gap exists between superiors and their subordinates because it is hard for the subordinates to air their views. (4) power distance gives managers unlimited power and control over subordinates. Employees, in turn, have an unquestioning, submissive attitude. (5) older and senior employees get respect from junior employees not because of former's competence but because of age and long tenure in the organisation. (6) in a high power distance culture, decisions are made by a few at the top autocratically Further, because of little resistance from lower level employees, decisions are made and implemented faster in a high power distance organisation. However, because of lack of input from lower level employees as well as poor communication and information sharing, quality of decisions is poorer in a high power distance organisation. (7) high power distance organisations are prone to unethical behaviour. This is because top managers have not to justify or defend their decisions to lower level employees or to the larger organisation. Unethical behaviour gets covered up or goes undetected. And (8), in a high power distance organisation, managers tend to micromanage and even minor decisions go to the top. Thus, higher level managers are inundated with routine decisions.

Power Distance, Uncertainty Avoidance, and Technology: Analyzing Hofstede's Dimensions and Human Development Indicators

Power Distance, Collectivism and Corruption: An Analysis Using Hofstede’s Cultural Dimensions Index and Corruption Perception Index

POWER DISTANCE INDEX AND ITS ROLE IN THE EFFICIENT FUNCTIONING OF MULTINATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS

Power Distance, Individualism/Collectivism, and Job-Related Attitudes in a Culturally Diverse Work Group

Human Development Index, ICT, and Renewable Energy-Growth Nexus for Sustainable Development: A Novel PVAR Analysis

Consequences of Power Distance Orientation in Organisations

Relationships between Hofstede's cultural dimensions and tourist satisfaction: A cross-country cross-sample examination

The dynamic linkage between information and communication technology, human development index, and economic growth: evidence from Asian economies

Breaking down power distance into 5 dimensions

Does technology affect human development? Examining some important moderating factors

Dimensions of national culture and corporate adoption of IT infrastructure

Are Scores on Hofstede's Dimensions of National Culture Stable over Time? A Cohort Analysis

The Regulatory Effects of Cross-Cultural Factors on Science and Technology Innovation

Power Distance and Facework Strategies

Asymmetric relationships between information and communication technology (ICT), globalization, and human development in India: evidence from non-linear ARDL analysis

Does acceptance of power distance influence propensities for problematic Internet use? Evidence from a cross-cultural study

Digital Divide and Social Dilemma of Privacy Preservation

Hofstede's cultural dimensions in technology acceptance models: a meta-analysis

Can dimensions of national culture predict cross-national differences in medical communication?

Examining the impact of Culture's consequences: A three-decade, multilevel, meta-analytic review of Hofstede's cultural value dimensions.