Abstract:Background Computer-aided detection software for automated breast ultrasound has been shown to have potential in improving the accuracy of radiologists. Alternative ways of implementing computer-aided detection, such as independent validation or preselecting suspicious cases, might also improve radiologists’ accuracy. Purpose To investigate the effect of using computer-aided detection software to improve the performance of radiologists by validating findings reported by radiologists during screening with automated breast ultrasound. Material and Methods Unilateral automated breast ultrasound exams were performed in 120 women with dense breasts that included 60 randomly selected normal exams, 30 exams with benign lesions, and 30 malignant cases (20 mammography-negative). Eight radiologists were instructed to detect breast cancer and rate lesions using BI-RADS and level-of-suspiciousness scores. Computer-aided detection software was used to check the validity of radiologists' findings. Findings found negative by computer-aided detection were not included in the readers’ performance analysis; however, the nature of these findings were further analyzed. The area under the curve and the partial area under the curve for an interval in the range of 80%–100% specificity before and after validation of computer-aided detection were compared. Sensitivity was computed for all readers at a simulation of 90% specificity. Results Partial AUC improved significantly from 0.126 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.098–0.153) to 0.142 (95% CI = 0.115–0.169) ( P = 0.037) after computer-aided detection rejected mostly benign lesions and normal tissue scored BI-RADS 3 or 4. The full areas under the curve (0.823 vs. 0.833, respectively) were not significantly different ( P = 0.743). Four cancers detected by readers were completely missed by computer-aided detection and four other cancers were detected by both readers and computer-aided detection but falsely rejected due to technical limitations of our implementation of computer-aided detection validation. In this study, validation of computer-aided detection discarded 42.6% of findings that were scored BI-RADS ≥3 by the radiologists, of which 85.5% were non-malignant findings. Conclusion Validation of radiologists’ findings using computer-aided detection software for automated breast ultrasound has the potential to improve the performance of radiologists. Validation of computer-aided detection might be an efficient tool for double-reading strategies by limiting the amount of discordant cases needed to be double-read.

Clinical Validation of Computer-Aided Diagnosis Software for Preventing Retained Surgical Sponges

Automated Identification of Retained Surgical Items in Radiological Images

Development of a Surgical Sponge Counting System Using Radiographic Images

Validation of a deep learning computer aided system for CT based lung nodule detection, classification, and growth rate estimation in a routine clinical population

Artificial intelligence model for automated surgical instrument detection and counting: an experimental proof-of-concept study

Automatic Surgical Items Tracking in Laparoscopic Surgery Utilizing Deep Learning for Retained Items Detection and Classification

Computer-aided diagnosis with a convolutional neural network algorithm for automated detection of urinary tract stones on plain X-ray

Validation of radiologists’ findings by computer-aided detection (CAD) software in breast cancer detection with automated 3D breast ultrasound: a concept study in implementation of artificial intelligence software

Clinical Application of Computer-Aided Diagnosis System in Breast Ultrasound: A Prospective Multicenter Study.

Development and evaluation of a double-check support system using artificial intelligence in endoscopic screening for gastric cancer

A Validation Study of the Deep-Learning-Based Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Scoring Algorithm

Computer-aided diagnosis for screening of lower extremity lymphedema in pelvic computed tomography images using deep learning

Deep Learning-Based Computer-Aided Diagnosis for Breast Lesion Classification on Ultrasound: A Prospective Multicenter Study of Radiologists Without Breast Ultrasound Expertise

Computer-Aided Assessment of Catheters and Tubes on Radiographs: How Good is Artificial Intelligence for Assessment?

Application value of a computer-aided diagnosis and management system for the detection of lung nodules

A deep learning-based automated diagnostic system for classifying mammographic lesions

Developing Interactive Computer-Aided Detection Tools to Support Translational Clinical Research

Clinical Application of Computer-Aided Diagnosis According to S-Detect in Category 4 Breast Lesions: Prospective Single-Center Study (Preprint)

Can surgical simulation be used to train detection and classification of neural networks?

Localization-adjusted diagnostic performance and assistance effect of a computer-aided detection system for pneumothorax and consolidation

Software-Automated Implant Detection for Intraoperative 3D Imaging-First Clinical Evaluation on 214 Data Sets