Abstract:In both statistical genetics and phylogenetics, a major goal is to identify correlations between genetic loci or other aspects of the phenotype or environment and a focal trait. In these two fields, there are sophisticated but disparate statistical traditions aimed at these tasks. The disconnect between their respective approaches is becoming untenable as questions in medicine, conservation biology, and evolutionary biology increasingly rely on integrating data from within and among species, and once-clear conceptual divisions are becoming increasingly blurred. To help bridge this divide, we derive a general model describing the covariance between the genetic contributions to the quantitative phenotypes of different individuals. Taking this approach shows that standard models in both statistical genetics (e.g., Genome-Wide Association Studies; GWAS) and phylogenetic comparative biology (e.g., phylogenetic regression) can be interpreted as special cases of this more general quantitative-genetic model. The fact that these models share the same core architecture means that we can build a unified understanding of the strengths and limitations of different methods for controlling for genetic structure when testing for associations. We develop intuition for why and when spurious correlations may occur using analytical theory and conduct population-genetic and phylogenetic simulations of quantitative traits. The structural similarity of problems in statistical genetics and phylogenetics enables us to take methodological advances from one field and apply them in the other. We demonstrate this by showing how a standard GWAS technique—including both the genetic relatedness matrix (GRM) as well as its leading eigenvectors, corresponding to the principal components of the genotype matrix, in a regression model—can mitigate spurious correlations in phylogenetic analyses. As a case study of this, we re-examine an analysis testing for co-evolution of expression levels between genes across a fungal phylogeny, and show that including covariance matrix eigenvectors as covariates decreases the false positive rate while simultaneously increasing the true positive rate. More generally, this work provides a foundation for more integrative approaches for understanding the genetic architecture of phenotypes and how evolutionary processes shape it.

DCA for genome-wide epistasis analysis: the statistical genetics perspective

Temporal epistasis inference from more than 3,500,000 SARS-CoV-2 Genomic Sequences

Direct Coupling Analysis of Epistasis in Allosteric Materials

COE: a General Approach for Efficient Genome-Wide Two-Locus Epistasis Test in Disease Association Study.

Direct-coupling analysis of residue co-evolution captures native contacts across many protein families

DCA: Dynamic Correlation Analysis

Detecting fitness epistasis in recently admixed populations with genome-wide data

Application Of Causal Inference To Genomic Analysis: Advances In Methodology

Unifying approaches from statistical genetics and phylogenetics for mapping phenotypes in structured populations

Pangenome-spanning epistasis and coselection analysis via de Bruijn graphs

A Flexible Novel Approach to Learn Epistasis Based on Ant Colony Optimization

A powerful framework for differential co-expression analysis of general risk factors

Efficient epistasis inference via higher-order covariance matrix factorization

A dynamic model for genome-wide association studies

A Statistical Procedure to Map High-Order Epistasis for Complex Traits.

Simultaneous identification of specifically interacting paralogs and inter-protein contacts by Direct-Coupling Analysis

A New Approach to Detect Epistasis Utilizing Parallel Implementation of Ant Colony Optimization by MapReduce Framework

Link-based Quantitative Methods to Identify Differentially Coexpressed Genes and Gene Pairs

DAM: A Bayesian Method for Detecting Genome-wide Associations on Multiple Diseases.

dCCA: detecting differential covariation patterns between two types of high-throughput omics data