Comparison of plasma biomarkers and amyloid PET for predicting memory decline in cognitively unimpaired individuals

Clifford R. Jack,Heather J. Wiste,Alicia Algeciras‐Schimnich,Stephen D. Weigand,Dan J. Figdore,Val J. Lowe,Prashanthi Vemuri,Jonathan Graff‐Radford,Vijay K. Ramanan,David S. Knopman,Michelle M. Mielke,Mary M. Machulda,Julie Fields,Christopher G. Schwarz,Petrice M. Cogswell,Matthew L. Senjem,Terry M. Therneau,Ronald C. Petersen
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.13651
2024-01-26
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Abstract:BACKGROUND We compared the ability of several plasma biomarkers versus amyloid positron emission tomography (PET) to predict rates of memory decline among cognitively unimpaired individuals. METHODS We studied 645 Mayo Clinic Study of Aging participants. Predictor variables were age, sex, education, apolipoprotein E (APOE) ε4 genotype, amyloid PET, and plasma amyloid beta (Aβ)42/40, phosphorylated tau (p‐tau)181, neurofilament light (NfL), glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), and p‐tau217. The outcome was a change in a memory composite measure. RESULTS All plasma biomarkers, except NfL, were associated with mean memory decline in models with individual biomarkers. However, amyloid PET and plasma p‐tau217, along with age, were key variables independently associated with mean memory decline in models combining all predictors. Confidence intervals were narrow for estimates of population mean prediction, but person‐level prediction intervals were wide. DISCUSSION Plasma p‐tau217 and amyloid PET provide useful information about predicting rates of future cognitive decline in cognitively unimpaired individuals at the population mean level, but not at the individual person level.
clinical neurology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?