Abstract:This is an updated version of the Cochrane Review first published in 2011, and most recently updated in 2019. Epilepsy is a chronic and disabling neurological disorder, affecting approximately 1% of the population. Up to 30% of people with epilepsy have seizures that are resistant to currently available antiepileptic drugs and require treatment with multiple antiepileptic drugs in combination. Felbamate is a second‐generation antiepileptic drug that can be used as add‐on therapy to standard antiepileptic drugs. To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of felbamate versus placebo when used as an add‐on treatment for people with drug‐resistant focal‐onset epilepsy. For the latest update, we searched the Cochrane Register of Studies (CRS Web) and MEDLINE (Ovid, 1946 to 13 July 2021) on 15 July 2021. There were no language or time restrictions. We reviewed the reference lists of retrieved studies to search for additional reports of relevant studies. We also contacted the manufacturers of felbamate and experts in the field for information about any unpublished or ongoing studies. We searched for randomised placebo‐controlled add‐on studies of people of any age with drug‐resistant focal seizures. The studies could be double‐blind, single‐blind or unblinded and could be of parallel‐group or cross‐over design. Two review authors independently selected studies for inclusion and extracted information. In the case of disagreements, a third review author arbitrated. Review authors assessed the following outcomes: 50% or greater reduction in seizure frequency; absolute or percentage reduction in seizure frequency; treatment withdrawal; adverse effects; quality of life. We included four randomised controlled trials, representing a total of 236 participants, in the review. Two trials had parallel‐group design, the third had a two‐period cross‐over design, and the fourth had a three‐period cross‐over design. We judged all four studies to be at an unclear risk of bias overall. Bias arose from the incomplete reporting of methodological details, the incomplete and selective reporting of outcome data, and from participants having unstable drug regimens during experimental treatment in one trial. Due to significant methodological heterogeneity, clinical heterogeneity and differences in outcome measures, it was not possible to perform a meta‐analysis of the extracted data. Only one study reported the outcome of 50% or greater reduction in seizure frequency, whilst three studies reported percentage reduction in seizure frequency compared to placebo. One study claimed an average seizure reduction of 35.8% with add‐on felbamate whilst another study claimed a more modest reduction of 4.2%. Both studies reported that seizure frequency increased with add‐on placebo and that there was a significant difference in seizure reduction between felbamate and placebo (P = 0.0005 and P = 0.018, respectively). The third study reported a 14% reduction in seizure frequency with add‐on felbamate but stated that the difference between treatments was not significant. There were conflicting results regarding treatment withdrawal. One study reported a higher treatment withdrawal for placebo‐randomised participants, whereas the other three studies reported higher treatment withdrawal rates for felbamate‐randomised participants. Notably, the treatment withdrawal rates for felbamate treatment groups across all four studies remained reasonably low (less than 10%), suggesting that felbamate may be well tolerated. Felbamate‐randomised participants most commonly withdrew from treatment due to adverse effects. The adverse effects consistently reported by all four studies were headache, dizziness and nausea. All three adverse effects were reported by 23% to 40% of felbamate‐treated participants versus 3% to 15% of placebo‐treated participants. We assessed the evidence for all outcomes using GRADE and rated the evidence as very low certainty, meaning that we have little confidence in the findings reported. We mainly downgraded evidence for imprecision due to the narrative synthesis conducted and the low number of events. We stress that the true effect of felbamate could likely be significantly different from that reported in this current review update. In view of the methodological deficiencies, the limited number of included studies and the differences in outcome measures, we have found no reliable evidence to support the use of felbamate as an add‐on therapy in people with drug‐resistant focal‐onset epilepsy. A large‐scale, randomised controlled trial conducted over a longer period of time is required to inform clinical practice. Background Up to 30% of people with epilepsy still suffer epileptic seizures despite trying multiple antiepileptic drugs, whether separately or in combination. These people are described as having drug‐resistant epilepsy. Drug resistance is most common in people with -Abstract Truncated-

Efficacy of felbamate in a cohort of patients with epilepsy with myoclonic atonic seizures (EMAtS)

Anti-Seizure Medication Treatment of Benign Childhood Epilepsy with Centrotemporal Spikes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Epilepsy with myoclonic absences: Electroclinical characteristics in a distinctive pediatric epilepsy phenotype

Felbamate add-on therapy for drug-resistant focal epilepsy.

Genetic testing in a cohort of patients with potential epilepsy with myoclonic-atonic seizures

Electroclinical Features and Long-term Seizure Outcome in Patients With Eyelid Myoclonia With Absences

Efficacy of Levetiracetam in Electrical Status Epilepticus During Sleep of Children: A Multicenter Experience

Lacosamide as adjunctive therapy in treatment-resistant epilepsy in childhood

Modified Atkins diet in children with epilepsy with eyelid myoclonia (Jeavons syndrome)

Efficacy and safety of antiepileptic drugs for refractory partial-onset epilepsy: a network meta-analysis

Levetiracetam versus carbamazepine monotherapy in the management of pediatric focal epilepsy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Meta-analyses of newer antiepileptic drugs as adjunct for treatment of focal epilepsy in children

Modified Atkins diet versus levetiracetam for non-surgical drug-resistant epilepsy in children: A randomized open-label study

Efficacy of a ketogenic diet in resistant myoclono-astatic epilepsy: A French multicenter retrospective study

Efficacy of Levetiracetam Combined with Short-Term Clonazepam in Treatment of Electrical Status Epilepticus During Sleep in Children with Benign Childhood Epilepsy with Centrotemporal Spikes

Neuropsychiatric comorbidities and cognition in epilepsy with eyelid myoclonia: A retrospective pediatric case series

Pharmacology and Therapeutic Aspects of Antiepileptic Drugs in Pediatrics

Therapeutic Effect of Levetiracetam for Epilepsy Combined with Electrical Status Epilepticus during Sleep in Children

Study on the effectiveness and safety of Levetiracetam in the treatment of epilepsy in infants under 2 years old

Treatment for the Benign Childhood Epilepsy With Centrotemporal Spikes: A Monocentric Study

Efficacy and safety of six new antiseizure medications for adjunctive treatment of focal epilepsy and epileptic syndrome: A systematic review and network meta-analysis