Abstract:The emissions of airborne contaminants from various industrial processes are an important source of air pollution and presents problems for human health and the environment in general. The removal of gaseous pollutants, such of nitrogen and sulphur oxides (NOx and SOx), from exhaust gases, or volatile organic compounds (VOC) emitted from various industrial processes is of continuous challenge in the environmental engineering. Plasma-based pollutant decomposition methods emerge as promising techniques, but little is known about their overall environmental performance. We compared two plasma based technologies (Electron Beam Flue Gas Treatment (EBFGT) and Dielectric Barrier Discharge (DBD) against the conventional methods (Wet Flue Gas Desulphurization with Selective Catalytic Reduction, WFGD+SCR, biofiltration and adsorption) using life cycle analysis (LCA), which took into account the usage of materials, waste generation and energy consumption. Five main categories (Global Warming, Ozone Layer Depletion, Acidification, Euthrophication and Human Toxicity, based on the CML2001 method) were used for the environmental impact evaluation. Based on CML2001 IKP Experts weighting, WFGD+SCR technology is marginally more environmentally friendly in comparison to EBFGT (59.25 to 73.74 CML2001 IKP Experts score). The generation of byproducts (in this case gypsum waste) is the main disadvantage of the WFGD+SCR. At the same time, EBFGT enables formation of useful byproducts, which are suitable to be utilized as fertilizers in the agriculture sector. On the other hand, DBD was six times more favorable to the environment than the adsorbtion and more than two times more environmentally friendly than the biofiltration technology (4.23, 27.78 and 9.29 relative units, respectively). With respect to the adsorption/thermal incineration of VOCs, both the electricity and the material consumption, as well as the management of byproducts caused the highest impact. In case of biofiltration, the management of remaining filter material waste (in this case, landfilling) was the most significant. Relatively high electrical energy demand causes lower positioning of plasma based technologies in cases where no other materials are utilized and major waste is formed. In turn, many traditional end-of pipe technologies are associated with high amounts of process waste, which provides plasma technologies with an opportunity to establish them in the market as more efficient and in many occasions, more environment-friendly ones.

Life cycle assessment of conventional and two-stage advanced energy-from-waste technologies for municipal solid waste treatment

Life Cycle Assessment of Pyrolysis, Gasification and Incineration Waste-to-energy Technologies: Theoretical Analysis and Case Study of Commercial Plants.

Life Cycle Environmental Assessment of Municipal Solid Waste to Energy Technologies: A Review Study

Life cycle assessment of pyrolysis–gasification as an emerging municipal solid waste treatment technology

Life Cycle Assessment Of Waste To Energy Micro-Pyrolysis System: Case Study For An Italian Town

Comparison of Waste-to-energy Technologies of Gasification and Incineration Using Life Cycle Assessment: Case Studies in Finland, France and China

Life Cycle Assessment of Advanced Circulating Fluidized Bed Municipal Solid Waste Incineration System from an Environmental and Exergetic Perspective

Waste-to-Energy technologies for municipal solid waste management: Bibliometric review, life cycle assessment, and energy potential case study

Report: comparison of environmental impacts from solid waste treatment and disposal facilities

Comparative life cycle assessment of plasma-based and traditional exhaust gas treatment technologies

Environmental and Exergetic Life Cycle Assessment of Incineration- and Gasification-Based Waste to Energy Systems in China

Key Factors Influencing the Environmental Performance of Pyrolysis, Gasification and Incineration Waste-to-Energy Technologies

Life cycle environmental assessment of thermal waste-to-energy technologies and energy–environment–economy model development

Comparison of Municipal Solid Waste Treatment Technologies from A Life Cycle Perspective in China

LCA to choose among alternative design solutions: the case study of a new Italian incineration line

Energy Recovery from Residual Municipal Solid Waste: State of the Art and Perspectives within the Challenge to Climate Change

Environmental Assessment of Solid Recovered Fuel Production from Screening Waste Using a Life Cycle Assessment Approach

Trends in the management of residual municipal solid waste

Environmental life cycle assessment of treatment and management strategies for food waste and sewage sludge

Environmental Comparison of Different Mechanical–Biological Treatment Plants by Combining Life Cycle Assessment and Material Flow Analysis

Is pyrolysis technology an advisable choice for municipal solid waste treatment from a low carbon perspective?