Qol-27. Patient Reported Outcome And Preference After Craniotomy And Laser Thermal Ablation: A Pilot Study

Isabela Peña Pino,Jiri Bartek,Clark Chen

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noae165.1062

2024-11-29

Neuro-Oncology

Abstract:Laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) is a minimally invasive procedure that allows cytoreduction in the treatment of brain tumors and can be considered by both surgeons and patients as an alternative to craniotomy. We surveyed 27 patients who underwent both craniotomy and LITT during distinct stages of their oncology journey to assess patient reported outcomes comparing both procedures. A nine question survey was developed and validated to assess patient reported post-operative recovery, pain level, narcotic use, and procedure preference. The survey was administered to patients with WHO II-IV gliomas who underwent both craniotomy and LITT. The survey was reviewed by independent surgeons, patient advocates, and patients in terms of face validity and showed >90% correlation in test-retest reliability. Our cohort had a mean age of 57 (+/- 12 years), 78% had glioblastoma. There was no significant difference in symptomatic improvement post-craniotomy or post-LITT (30% versus 4%, p=0.17). Similarly, no significance was detected in patient-reported recovery time from craniotomy (time required to return to pre-operative state, 4.3 +/- 9.1 weeks, median 2 weeks) or LITT (2 ± 2.3 weeks, median 1 week)(p=0.21). Notably, post-surgical pain (1-10 pain scale) and need for narcotic use in the first week (yes/no) after the procedure were significantly lower post-LITT (average pain score 1.7 versus 5 points, narcotic use 4% versus 81%, p<0.0005 for both comparisons). When asked which procedure they would choose – having experienced both craniotomy and LITT, surveyed patients overwhelmingly chose LITT over craniotomy (89% versus 11%, p<0.0005). Of note, the patients who preferred craniotomy experienced improved neurologic function post-craniotomy or suffered new deficits post-LITT. In this pilot study, patients reported less pain and narcotic use post-LITT relative to craniotomy and generally preferred the former procedure if given the choice. Validation of these results in future studies can help inform decision making in clinical scenarios where there is equipoise between LITT and craniotomy.

oncology,clinical neurology