Revised Cochrane risk of bias tool for randomized trials (RoB 2.0): additional considerations for cluster-randomized trials

Sandra Eldridge, Marion Campbell, Michael Campbell, Amy Dahota, Bruno Giraudeau, Julian Higgins, Barney Reeves, Nandi Siegfried

2016-10-20

Abstract:In cluster-randomized trials, groups of individuals rather than individuals are randomized to different interventions. The groups may be, for example, schools, villages, medical practices or families. In some trials, individuals are allocated to interventions that are then applied to multiple parts of those individuals (for example, to both eyes or to several teeth), or repeated observations are made on a participant. If the analysis is by the individual units (for example, each tooth or each observation) then individual units are clustered within individuals in the same way that individuals are clustered within, for example, medical practices. However, the terminology used to describe the clusters (individuals) and cluster members (units) will often be different and trying to deal with both types of scenarios using one set of signalling questions is complex. In this tool we therefore focus on trials in which groups of individuals are randomized. This includes stepped-wedge trials in which randomization is by cluster, although there is a source of bias in these trials if they are analysed without adjustment for secular trends which is not directly covered in the tool (1).One of the main consequences of a cluster design is that participants within any one cluster often tend to respond in a similar manner, and thus their data can no longer be assumed to be independent of one another. It is important that the analysis of a cluster-randomized trial takes into account this issue. Unfortunately, many studies have in the past been incorrectly analysed as though the unit of allocation had been the individual participants. This is often referred to as a “unit-of-analysis error” because the unit of …