Abstract:This prospective study aimed to compare ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) with polyetheretherketone (PEEK) in computer-designed patient-specific implants (PSIs) for cranial defect reconstruction, in terms of complications and aesthetic outcomes. Primary or secondary cranioplasty-eligible patients were included, while patients with active infection or hydrocephalus, or unfit for general anesthesia, were excluded from the study. All the implants were designed and fabricated by the same maxillofacial surgeon using CAD/CAM technology. UHMWPE PSIs were used in group 1 and PEEK PSIs in group 2. Technically, UHMWPE could be milled to a thinner margin thickness than PEEK, which resulted in better handling properties and a smoother end finish. All patients were evaluated over a period of 6 months in terms of overall complications or implant failure as the primary outcome, according to Clavien-Dindo (CVD) grading, and cosmetic satisfaction with the aesthetic results, using a Likert scale, as the secondary outcome. In total, 22 cranioplasty patients were included, with a mean age of 30.8 years (SD = 16.3). Across both groups, 17 patients (77.3%) did not develop postoperative complications. These occurred in three patients in group 1 (CVD grade I, II, and IIIb) (27.3%) and in two patients in group 2 (CVD grade II, IIIa, and IIIb) (18.2%), with no statistical difference (p = 0.6). None of the cases in both groups developed any clinical or radiographic signs of infection, or suffered implant failure. The mean satisfaction score was 4.8 in group 1 and 4.5 in group 2 (SD = 0.6). The difference in satisfaction scores between the two was not statistically significant (p = 0.23). Although UHMWPEE was comparable to PEEK in terms of overall complication rates and cosmesis after craniectomy, UHMWPEE as a material exhibited greater resiliency in technically challenging cases with large, complex/midline-crossing designs, previously fitted meshes, or single-stage resection-reconstruction, allowing better marginal adaptation.

Perioperative management and prevention of postoperative complications in patients undergoing cranioplasty with polyetheretherketone

Improved Strategy for Post-Traumatic Hydrocephalus Following Decompressive Craniectomy: Experience of a Single Center

Allergic Epidural Effusion Following Polyetheretherketone Cranioplasty.

Effects of Ipratropium Bromide on the Occurrence of Postoperative Respiratory Complications in Craniectomy Patients with COPD: A Nationwide Multicenter Retrospective Study.

Does It Really Not Matter if Dural Substitute is Overlay or Underlay? A Case Report of Serious Postoperative Epidural Effusion

Issues in Cranioplasty after Traumatic Skull Defect

Analysis of application of polyetheretherketone and titanium mesh in cranioplasty

Timing and material for cranioplasty in patients with posttraumatic skull defects

The effect of early cranioplasty on prognosis of patients with decompressive craniectomy due to head trauma

879 Comparison of Perioperative and Long-Term Outcomes Following PEEK and Autologous Cranioplasty: A Single Institution Experience

Cranioplasty of large cranial defect at an early stage after decompressive craniectomy performed for severe head trauma.

Cranioplasty using patient specific implants Polyether ether ketone versus ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene: A prospective study

Cranioplasty for patients developing large cranial defects combined with post-traumatic hydrocephalus after head trauma.

Polyetheretherketone Implant Cranioplasty for Large Cranial Defects: A Seven-Year Follow-Up

Lower complication rates for cranioplasty with peri-operative bundle

The Applicability of Polyetheretherketone and Titanium Mesh in Cranioplasty: A Retrospective Comparative Analysis

Comparison of 3D-printed poly-ether-ether-ketone and traditional implant materials in cranioplasty

Predictive factors for cranioplasty complications - A decade's experience

Three-dimensional personalized porous polyethylen cranioplasty in patients at increased risk of surgical site infection

Letter to editor: Exploring complications following cranioplasty after decompressive hemicraniectomy: A retrospective bicenter assessment of autologous, PMMA and CAD implants

High-Density Porous Polyethylene Implant Cranioplasty: A Systematic Review of Outcomes