Abstract:Background: Every month, around 3800 people complete an anonymous self-test for suicidal thoughts on the website of the Dutch suicide prevention helpline. Although 70% score high on the severity of suicidal thoughts, <10% navigate to the web page about contacting the helpline. Objective: This study aimed to test the effectiveness of a brief barrier reduction intervention (BRI) in motivating people with severe suicidal thoughts to contact the suicide prevention helpline, specifically in high-risk groups such as men and middle-aged people. Methods: We conducted a fully automated, web-based, randomized controlled trial. Respondents with severe suicidal thoughts and little motivation to contact the helpline were randomly allocated either to a brief BRI, in which they received a short, tailored message based on their self-reported barrier to the helpline (n=610), or a general advisory text (care as usual as the control group: n=612). Effectiveness was evaluated using both behavioral and attitudinal measurements. The primary outcome measure was the use of a direct link to contact the helpline after completing the intervention or control condition. Secondary outcomes were the self-reported likelihood of contacting the helpline and satisfaction with the received self-test. Results: In total, 2124 website visitors completed the Suicidal Ideation Attributes Scale and the demographic questions in the entry screening questionnaire. Among them, 1222 were randomized into the intervention or control group. Eventually, 772 respondents completed the randomized controlled trial (intervention group: n=369; control group: n=403). The most selected barrier in both groups was "I don't think that my problems are serious enough." At the end of the trial, 33.1% (n=122) of the respondents in the intervention group used the direct link to the helpline. This was not significantly different from the respondents in the control group (144/403, 35.7%; odds ratio 0.87, 95% CI 0.64-1.18, P=.38). However, the respondents who received the BRI did score higher on their self-reported likelihood of contacting the helpline at a later point in time (B=0.22, 95% CI 0.12-0.32, P≤.001) and on satisfaction with the self-test (B=0.27, 95% CI 0.01-0.53, P=.04). For male and middle-aged respondents specifically, the results were comparable to that of the whole group. Conclusions: This trial was the first time the helpline was able to connect with high-risk website visitors who were hesitant to contact the helpline. Although the BRI could not ensure that those respondents immediately used the direct link to the helpline at the end of the trial, it is encouraging that respondents indicated that they were more likely to contact the helpline at a later point in time. In addition, this low-cost intervention provided greater insight into the perceived barriers to service. Follow-up research should be focused on identifying the added value of other components (eg, video or photo material) in the BRI and increasing its effectiveness, especially for men and middle-aged people.

Evaluating an Intervention for the Elderly at Increased Risk of Suicide

Evaluating an Intervention for the Elderly at Increased Risk of Suicide

A proactive phone intervention for older adults to address loneliness identified by a health plan

Prospective Study of Association of Characteristics of Hotline Psychological Intervention in 778 High-Risk Callers with Subsequent Suicidal Act.

Effectiveness of a resilience-targeted intervention based on “I have, I am, I can” strategy on nursing home older adults' suicidal ideation: A randomized controlled trial

LONELINESS AND OLDER ADULTS: RESULTS FROM A COMMUNITY-BASED INTERVENTION

Impact of a peer-support programme to improve loneliness and social isolation due to COVID-19: does adding a secure, user friendly video-conference solution work better than telephone support alone? Protocol for a three-arm randomised clinical trial

Follow-Up Care Offers and Acceptance in Crisis Line Suicide Prevention Services

Older Adults’ Experiences in a Web-Based Intervention for Loneliness

Brief psychological intervention for suicide prevention based on problem-solving applied in different formats to people over 50 years old: protocol for a randomized controlled trial

A peer intervention reduces loneliness and improves social well-being in low-income older adults: A mixed-methods study

Breaking Down Barriers to a Suicide Prevention Helpline: Web-Based Randomized Controlled Trial

Digitally Enabled Peer Support Intervention to Address Loneliness and Mental Health: Prospective Cohort Analysis

Effectiveness of 18-month psychosocial intervention for suicide attempters

Effect of telephone follow-up on repeated suicide attempt in patients discharged from an emergency psychiatry department: a controlled study

Waitlist-controlled trial of an online intervention to address mental health among older people living with HIV

Assessing a Suicide Prevention Helpline's Impact on Caller Crisis Level and Suicidality

Feasibility of a web-based program for secondary prevention of suicidal behavior: The iFight Depression-Survive

Comparisons of characteristics of adult and juvenile callers at high risk for suicide from psychological assistance hotline and the influencing factors of intervention effect

What interventions work for suicide prevention? and do they work for the elderly?

Inpatient Care for Elderly Suicide Survivors: Nurse-Led Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy