Race and Ethnicity Independently Predict Adverse Outcomes Following Head and Neck Autograft Surgery

Tatiana Ferraro,Abdulla K. Ahmed,Esther Lee,Sean M. Lee,Peter M. Debbaneh,Punam Thakkar,Arjun Joshi,Neelima Tummala
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.31367
IF: 2.97
2024-02-28
The Laryngoscope
Abstract:Objective There is growing attention toward the implications of race and ethnicity on health disparities within otolaryngology. While race is an established predictor of adverse head and neck oncologic outcomes, there is paucity in the literature on studies employing national, multi‐institutional data to assess the impact of race and ethnicity on head and neck autograft surgery. Methods Using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database, trends in 30 days outcomes were assessed. Patients with ICD‐10 codes for malignant head and neck neoplasms were isolated. Autograft surgeries were selected using Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes for free flap and pedicled flap reconstruction. Primary outcomes included surgical complications, reoperation, readmission, extended length of stay and operation time. Each binary categorical variable was compared to racial/ethnic identity via binary logistic regression. Results The study cohort consisted of 2447 patients who underwent head and neck autograft surgery (80.71% free flap reconstruction and 19.39% pedicled flap reconstruction). Black patients had significantly higher odds of overall surgical complications (odds ratio [OR] 1.583, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.091, 2.298, p = 0.016) with much higher odds of perioperative blood transfusions (OR 2.291, 95% CI 1.532, 3.426, p =
medicine, research & experimental,otorhinolaryngology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?