Abstract:The interaction between social, physical and economic environment in urban areas defines the quality of urban life. Urban dwellers’ perceived quality of urban life is determined by the degree of satisfaction in their lives andin the society and the environment they live in, as well. The capacity of the city’s public facilitiescontributes to the quality of urban life. If the level of public services such as health, education, security,social and cultural facilities, amenities for individual and familydevelopment, etc.increase in the living environment, quality of urban life will increase also. Depending on this assumption, public service areas can be considered as general determinants of quality of life in neighborhoods. In the literature, the strong relationship between quality of life and public services is emphasized. Not only the level of satisfaction with the services, but also the ability to access the services and benefit from them are required for the quality of urban life. Quality of urban public services will contribute to the overall quality of urban life and the satisfaction with these services will contribute to the overall satisfaction of the inhabitants. The quality of urban life is significantly influenced by the policies of the central and local governments and their implementations. Local authorities have been charged with promoting the well-being of their area. If their policies on urban public services are effective,and if these services are provided with high standards, the quality of urban life will improve in that locality. Within this context, the relationship between public spaces/public services and quality of life in neighborhoods will be evaluated in this study. In order to realize this, spatial measurements of public service areas (primary and secondary schools, healthcare services, libraries, parks, playgrounds, social and recreational facilities, sports facilities, facilities for music, theatre, and art, etc.) considering their amount per inhabitants will be assessed in Cankaya, the biggest district of Ankara. A total of 919.119 people live in 124 neighborhoods in Cankaya district where central governmental bodies and several public institutions, universities, embassies, business areas, trade centers, hotels, culture and art institutions, etc. are located.Thesocial and economic characteristics of the neighborhoods and the public services provided in these neighborhoods differentiate in Cankaya. Thus, spatial measurements of public service areas in the neighborhoods and their evaluations considering the amount per inhabitants will help to explain the current situation of urban public service supply andin addition, the sectoral and spatial conditions of the service areas will guide the policies for the future supply of services to contribute to the quality of life in the neighborhoods.

Prioritizing user preferences for quasi – Public space by using analytic hierarchy process (AHP): bursa Podyum park, Turkey case

Relationship of public preferences and behavior in residential outdoor spaces using analytic hierarchy process and principal component analysis—a case study of Hangzhou City, China

A Spatial Analysis of the Urban Public Space: Case Study the Museum of Islamic Art Park, Doha

Urban Squares within the Framework of Urban Design: Kadıköy Square, Turkey

A Multi-Objective Optimization of Physical Activity Spaces

Assessing Neighbourhood Preference: An Evaluation of Environmental Features within Small-Scale Open Spaces

Evaluation and Analysis of Quantitative Architectural Space Index Based on Analytic Hierarchy Process

Public Health—Urban Landscaping Relationship and user's Perceptions

Analysis of Environmental Activities for Developing Public Health Investments and Policies: A Comparative Study with Structure Equation and Interval Type 2 Fuzzy Hybrid Models.

Evolution of interior space design criteria on the quality of urban environment: Literature review

Cultural Differences in Attitudes towards Urban Parks and Green Spaces

Relationships between the visual preferences of urban recreation area users and various landscape design elements

Selecting the right location for sports facilities using analytical hierarchy process

Evaluating Public Space

Analysing the Design Criteria of Public Open Spaces for the Disabled Persons: An Evaluation of Kumsal Park in Northern Cyprus

How Can People with Disabilities Use the Outdoors? An Assessment Within the Framework of Disability Standards

Evaluation of Park-and-Ride Application with AHP and ANP Methods for the City of Eskisehir, Turkey

Visual questionnaire survey to apply design possibilities in relation to planting enclosure in five vest-pocket parks

Public Service Areas within the Context of Quality of Urban Life: The Case Of Çankaya Municipality of Ankara

Transformation of Modern Urban Park Based on User’s Spatial Perceived Preferences: A Case Study of Kowloon Walled City Park in Hong Kong

THE CORRELATIONAL RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS, ACTIVITIES, AND SENSE OF PLACE OF A PUBLIC SPACE