Patient reported outcomes (PROs) among patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) by homologous recombination repair mutations (HRRm) gene clusters: Findings from the phase 3 TALAPRO-2 study cohort 2.

Karim Fizazi,Neal D. Shore,Peter C.C. Fong,Arun Azad,Nobuaki Matsubara,Fred Saad,Ugo De Giorgi,Jae Young Joung,Robert J. Jones,Stefanie Zschaebitz,Jan Oldenburg,Curtis Dunshee,Joan Carles,Andre P. Fay,Paul Cislo,Melissa Kirker,Cynthia G. Healy,Alexander Niyazov,Neeraj Agarwal
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2024.42.4_suppl.109
IF: 45.3
2024-02-01
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Abstract:109 Background: Cohort 2 of the TALAPRO-2 (NCT03395197) study demonstrated benefit in radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS) with talazoparib (TALA) plus enzalutamide (ENZA) (n=200) vs placebo (PBO) + ENZA (n=199) across gene subgroups in men with HRRm receiving first-line treatment for mCRPC. Post-hoc analyses aimed to understand PROs by HRR gene clusters. Methods: PROs were assessed at day 1 and scheduled visits (every 4 weeks until week 53, then every 8 weeks) until radiographic progression using the EORTC QLQ-C30 and PR25 and BPI-SF. Prespecified PRO endpoints included overall mean change from baseline (per longitudinal repeated measures mixed-effects model) and time to definitive deterioration (TTDD) with a clinically meaningful change of ≥10-points for the EORTC QLQ-C30. Stratified log-rank test and Cox proportional hazards model were used to make TTDD between-arm comparisons. Mutually exclusive gene clustering alteration dominance hierarchy was applied in the following order: any BRCA1/2 alteration (BRCAm cluster), PALB2 (PALB2 cluster), CDK12 (CDK12 cluster), ATM (ATM cluster), then any of all other HRR7genes (MLH1, CHEK2, NBN, FANCA, ATR, RAD51C, MRE11A). Results: A significantly longer TTDD in GHS/QoL was observed for TALA + ENZA vs PBO + ENZA in the BRCAm (HR=0.54, 95% CI (0.29, 0.99); p=0.043; median NE vs 19.0) and CDK12 clusters (HR=0.43 (0.19, 0.98); p=0.019, median 30.7 vs 16.6). Overall changes from baseline in GHS/QoL and worst pain are reported in the Table. Conclusions: PRO findings by HRR gene clusters are consistent with rPFS benefit analyses by gene clusters. This was an exploratory post-hoc analysis limited by missing PRO assessments and sample sizes especially in the PALB2 cluster. Clinical trial information: NCT03395197 . [Table: see text]
oncology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?