Using point-of-care testing for adult patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest resuscitated at the emergency department to predict return of spontaneous circulation: Development and external validation of POC-ED-ROSC model

Chun-Yen Huang,Tsung-Chien Lu,Chu-Lin Tsai,Cheng-Yi Wu,Eric Chou,Chih-Hung Wang,Min-Shan Tsai,Wei-Tien Chang,Chien-Hua Huang,Wen-Jone Chen
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2023.06.022
2023-06-17
Abstract:Background and importance Most prediction models, like return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) after cardiac arrest (RACA) or Utstein-based (UB)-ROSC score, were developed for prehospital settings to predict the probability of ROSC in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). A prediction model has been lacking for the probability of ROSC in patients with OHCA at emergency departments (EDs). Objective In the present study, a point-of-care (POC) testing-based model, POC-ED-ROSC, was developed and validated for predicting ROSC of OHCA at EDs. Design, settings and participants Prospectively collected data for adult OHCA patients between 2015 and 2020 were analysed. POC blood gas analysis obtained within 5 min of ED arrival was used. Outcomes measure and analysis The primary outcome was ROSC. In the derivation cohort, multivariable logistic regression was used to develop the POC-ED-ROSC model. In the temporally split validation cohort, the discriminative performance of the POC-ED-ROSC model was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) and compared with RACA or UB-ROSC score using DeLong test. Main results The study included 606 and 270 patients in the derivation and validation cohorts, respectively. In the total cohort, 471 patients achieved ROSC. Age, initial cardiac rhythm at ED, pre-hospital resuscitation duration, and POC testing-measured blood levels of lactate, potassium and glucose were significant predictors included in the POC-ED-ROSC model. The model was validated with fair discriminative performance (AUC: 0.75, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.69–0.81) with no significant differences from RACA (AUC: 0.68, 95% CI: 0.62–0.74) or UB-ROSC score (AUC: 0.74, 95% CI: 0.68–0.79). Conclusion Using only six easily accessible variables, the POC-ED-ROSC model can predict ROSC for OHCA resuscitated at ED with fair accuracy.
emergency medicine
What problem does this paper attempt to address?