Evaluation of GFAP, S100B, and UCHL-1 Levels in Children With Refractory Epilepsy

Halil Ural Aksoy,Celil Yılmaz,Sibgatullah Ali Orak,Senem Ayça,Muzaffer Polat
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/08830738241273339
2024-08-21
Journal of Child Neurology
Abstract:Journal of Child Neurology, Ahead of Print. IntroductionA number of biomarkers are used to evaluate the duration of the epileptic seizure and the interictal period following neuronal injury. Invasive diagnostic methods are increasingly being replaced by peripheral or minimally invasive biomarkers that give results faster and are more secure.PurposeWe aimed to evaluate serum glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), S100B, and ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase (UCHL-1) levels in children with epilepsy.MethodsOur study included 3 groups: a nonrefractory epilepsy group, a refractory epilepsy group, and a control group. The GFAP, S100B, and UCHL-1 levels in serum samples collected 2-24 hours after the last seizure were analyzed using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays.ResultsA total of 69 children participated in the study, with 35 participants in the refractory epilepsy group, 18 in the nonrefractory epilepsy group, and 16 in the control group. The GFAP values in the refractory (25.4 ng/mL) and nonrefractory (26.1 ng/mL) epilepsy groups were found to be statistically significantly higher than those in the control group (17.9 ng/mL; P = .001). The S100B values were found to be significantly higher in the refractory epilepsy group (34.13 pg/mL) than in both the control group and the nonrefractory epilepsy group (28.05 pg/mL; P = .028). No significant differences were observed in the UCHL-1 levels between the 3 groups.ConclusionsWe conclude that the observed differences may be due to the increased expression of S100B and GFAP caused by increased and repetitive neuronal damage in refractory epilepsies compared with nonrefractory epilepsies.
pediatrics,clinical neurology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?