Abstract:Due to increased climate uncertainty, political instability and economic turbulence, many interstate river basins are in the midst of transforming their water governance strategies to embrace the aforementioned challenges. A prerequisite of achieving such transformation is to understand various types of rules that build the water governance structure of the river basins. Therefore, we demonstrate an institutional analysis approach that combines the institutional grammar and the institutional analysis and development framework’s rule typology to identify the various type of formal rules regulating the water resources in Australia’s Murray-Darling Basin (MDB). The institutional feature and key actors of the basin’s water governance structure under different water governance situations are also explored. The approach is built on an institutional content analysis tool named institutional grammar and the institutional analysis and development framework’s rule typology. Using the approach, we dissect the Murray-Darling Basin Agreement of Australian Government’s Water Act 2007 to generate data for institutional analysis and subsequently, identifying the number and types of rules that form MDB’s water governance structure. We identify that MDB’s water governance structure stresses on choice rules and information rules that regulate actors’ choice of actions and the flow of information. Nevertheless, there are rules that only present in certain water governance situations, which indicating its institutional features. For instance, the position rules that create the basin’s water resource administrative units are found only in the action situation of administration. The scope rules that delineate the physical outcome to be produced are found dominating the action situations of water resource appropriation. The co-thinking type of aggregation rules that control the requirement of stakeholder consultation are mostly found in the situation of basin planning. In conclusion, the proposed approach able to generate the quantitative and qualitative information that can be used to analyze the complex structure of water resource governance in a river basin. Therefore, the research contributes to the development of a systematic water institution analysis tool.

Governance and management of large US river basins in diverse regions under a federal government model

Modelling to bridge many boundaries: the Colorado and Murray-Darling River basins

Basin-wide knowledge exchange for the sustainable management of the Colorado River

The state of water quality strategies in the Mississippi River Basin: Is cooperative federalism working?

Water Law and Climate Change in the United States: A Review of the Scholarship

Water law and climate change in the United States: A review of the legal scholarship

Water use governance in a temperate region: Implications for agricultural climate change adaptation in the Northeastern United States

Implications of the Mississippi v. Tennessee Supreme Court Decision for Interstate Groundwater Management

Can continental transboundary compacts hold water?

Introduction to section 1

Large-scale water development in the United States: TVA and the California State Water Project

Transboundary Water Governance Scholarship: A Critical Review

Risk Sharing And Governance Structure Over Large Irrigation Infrastructure

Beyond engagement: Enhancing equity in collaborative water governance

An Improved 21st Century Judicial System with Environmental Science Expertise is Needed for Resolving Interstate Water Conflicts

Intranational Cooperation and Conflict over Freshwater: Examples from the Western United States

Efficient and resilient governance of social–ecological systems

Decomposing the Institutional Structure of Interstate River Basins Using Institutional Grammar and Institutional Analysis and Development Framework

Applying institutional grammar to analyze the institutional structure of water resources governance in interstate river basins

Managing the Cascading Risks of Droughts: Institutional Adaptation in Transboundary River Basins

Multilevel Governance: Framing the Integration of Top-Down and Bottom-Up Policymaking