Switching from Intermittently Scanned Continuous Glucose Monitoring to Real Time Continuous Glucose Monitoring with a predictive urgent low soon alert reduces exposure to hypoglycaemia

lukana preechasuk,Nick Oliver,Parizad Avari,Monika Reddy
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/dia.2023.0434
2024-02-06
Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics
Abstract:Differences in the effectiveness of real-time continuous glucose monitoring (rtCGM) and intermittently scanned continuous glucose monitoring (isCGM) in type 1 diabetes (T1D) are reported. The impact on percentage time in range of switching from an isCGM with glucose threshold-based optional alerts only (FreeStyle Libre 2, FSL2) to rtCGM (Dexcom G7) with an urgent low soon predictive alert was assessed, alongside other secondary outcomes including HbA1c and other CGM metrics. Adults with T1D using FSL2 were switched to Dexcom G7 for 12 weeks. HbA1c and continuous glucose data during FSL2 and Dexcom G7 use were compared. Data from 29 participants (aged 44.8±16.5 years, 12 male) were analysed. After switching to rtCGM, participants spent less time in hypoglycaemia below 3.9mmol/L (70 mg/dL) (3.0[1.0,5.0] vs. 2.0[1.0,3.0] %, P=0.006) and had higher percentage achievement of time below 3.9 mmol/L (70 mg/dl) less than 4% (55.2 vs. 82.8%, P= 0.005). Coefficient of variation was lower (39.3±6.6 vs. 37.2±5.6%, p=0.008). In conclusion, adults with T1D that switch from isCGM to rtCGM may benefit from reduced exposure to hypoglycaemia and glycaemic variability.
endocrinology & metabolism
What problem does this paper attempt to address?