Abstract:Understanding and quantifying the global methane (CH 4 ) budget is important for assessing realistic pathways to mitigate climate change. Emissions and atmospheric concentrations of CH 4 continue to increase, maintaining CH 4 as the second most important human-influenced greenhouse gas in terms of climate forcing after carbon dioxide (CO 2 ). The relative importance of CH 4 compared to CO 2 for temperature change is related to its shorter atmospheric lifetime, stronger radiative effect, and acceleration in atmospheric growth rate over the past decade, the causes of which are still debated. Two major challenges in reducing uncertainties in the factors explaining the well-observed atmospheric growth rate arise from diverse, geographically overlapping CH 4 sources and from the uncertain magnitude and temporal change in the destruction of CH 4 by short-lived and highly variable hydroxyl radicals (OH). To address these challenges, we have established a consortium of multi-disciplinary scientists under the umbrella of the Global Carbon Project to improve, synthesise and update the global CH 4 budget regularly and to stimulate new research on the methane cycle. Following Saunois et al. (2016, 2020), we present here the third version of the living review paper dedicated to the decadal CH 4 budget, integrating results of top-down CH 4 emission estimates (based on in-situ and greenhouse gas observing satellite (GOSAT) atmospheric observations and an ensemble of atmospheric inverse-model results) and bottom-up estimates (based on process-based models for estimating land-surface emissions and atmospheric chemistry, inventories of anthropogenic emissions, and data-driven extrapolations). We present a budget for the most recent 2010–2019 calendar decade (the latest period for which full datasets are available), for the previous decade of 2000–2009 and for the year 2020. The revision of the bottom-up budget in this edition benefits from important progress in estimating inland freshwater emissions, with better accounting of emissions from lakes and ponds, reservoirs, and streams and rivers. This budget also reduces double accounting across freshwater and wetland emissions and, for the first time, includes an estimate of the potential double accounting that still exists (average of 23 Tg CH 4 yr -1 ). Bottom-up approaches show that the combined wetland and inland freshwater emissions average 248 [159–369] Tg CH 4 yr -1 for the 2010–2019 decade. Natural fluxes are perturbed by human activities through climate, eutrophication, and land use. In this budget, we also estimate, for the first time, this anthropogenic component contributing to wetland and inland freshwater emissions. Newly available gridded products also allowed us to derive an almost complete latitudinal and regional budget based on bottom-up approaches. For the 2010–2019 decade, global CH 4 emissions are estimated by atmospheric inversions (top-down) to be 575 Tg CH 4 yr -1 (range 553–586, corresponding to the minimum and maximum estimates of the model ensemble). Of this amount, 369 Tg CH 4 yr -1 or ~65 % are attributed to direct anthropogenic sources in the fossil, agriculture and waste and anthropogenic biomass burning (range 350–391 Tg CH 4 yr -1 or 63–68 %). For the 2000–2009 period, the atmospheric inversions give a slightly lower total emission than for 2010–2019, by 32 Tg CH 4 yr -1 (range 9–40). Since 2012, global direct anthropogenic CH 4 emission trends have been tracking scenarios that assume no or minimal climate mitigation policies proposed by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (shared socio-economic pathways SSP5 and SSP3). Bottom-up methods suggest 16 % (94 Tg CH 4 yr -1 ) larger global emissions (669 Tg CH 4 yr -1 , range 512–849) than top-down inversion methods for the 2010–2019 period. The discrepancy between the bottom-up and the top-down budgets has been greatly reduced compared to the previous differences (167 and 156 Tg CH 4 yr -1 in Saunois et al. (2016, 2020), respectively), and for the first time uncertainty in bottom-up and top-down budgets overlap. The latitudinal distribution from atmospheric inversion-based emissions indicates a predominance of tropical and southern hemisphere emissions (~65 % of the global budget, <30° N) compared to mid (30° N–60° N, ~30 % of emissions) and high-northern latitudes (60° N–90° N, ~4 % of global emissions). This latitudinal distribution is similar in the bottom-up budget though the bottom-up budget estimates slightly larger contributions for the mid and high-northern latitudes, and slightly smaller contributions from the tr -Abstract Truncated-

Atmospheric data support a multi-decadal shift in the global methane budget towards natural tropical emissions

Attribution of the Accelerating Increase in Atmospheric Methane During 2010&#8211;2018 by Inverse Analysis of GOSAT Observations

Variability and Quasi-Decadal Changes in the Methane Budget over the Period 2000–2012

Inverse modeling of 2010-2022 satellite observations shows that inundation of the wet tropics drove the 2020-2022 methane surge

Why Atmospheric Methane Surged in 2020?

Accelerating methane growth rate from 2010 to 2017: leading contributions from the tropics and East Asia

Anthropogenic emission is the main contributor to the rise of atmospheric methane during 1993–2017

Global Methane Budget 2000–2020

Global Wetland Contribution to 2000–2012 Atmospheric Methane Growth Rate Dynamics

Global atmospheric methane: budget, changes and dangers

Wetland emission and atmospheric sink changes explain methane growth in 2020

Decadal Methane Emission Trend Inferred from Proxy GOSAT XCH4 Retrievals: Impacts of Transport Model Spatial Resolution

Tropical methane emissions explain large fraction of recent changes in global atmospheric methane growth rate

Investigation of the renewed methane growth post-2007 with high-resolution 3-D variational inverse modeling and isotopic constraints

An Integrated Analysis of Contemporary Methane Emissions and Concentration Trends over China Using in Situ and Satellite Observations and Model Simulations

Rapid shift in methane carbon isotopes suggests microbial emissions drove record high atmospheric methane growth in 2020-2022

Attribution of the 2020 surge in atmospheric methane by inverse analysis of GOSAT observations

A high-resolution satellite-based map of global methane emissions reveals missing wetland, fossil fuel, and monsoon sources

Regional trends and drivers of the global methane budget

Three Decades of Global Methane Sources and Sinks

Spatiotemporal Variations in Atmospheric CH4 Concentrations and Enhancements in Northern China Based on a Comprehensive Dataset: Ground-based Observations, TROPOMI Data, Inventory Data and Inversions