Sustainable coffee: A review of the diverse initiatives and governance dimensions of global coffee supply chains

Dale R. Wright,Sarah A. Bekessy,Pia E. Lentini,Georgia E. Garrard,Ascelin Gordon,Amanda D. Rodewald,Ruth E. Bennett,Matthew J. Selinske
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-024-02003-w
IF: 6.94
2024-04-29
AMBIO
Abstract:Abstract With a global footprint of 10 million hectares across 12.5 million farms, coffee is among the world’s most traded commodities. The coffee industry has launched a variety of initiatives designed to reduce coffee’s contribution to climate change and biodiversity loss and enhance the socio-economic conditions of coffee producers. We systematically reviewed the literature on the sustainability and governance of coffee production and developed a typology of eleven sustainability initiatives. Our review shows that coffee sustainability research has focused primarily on the economic outcomes of certification schemes. The typology expands our knowledge of novel sustainability initiatives being led by coffee farming communities themselves, allowing for an improved consideration of power dynamics in sustainability governance. Sustainability initiatives governed by local actors can improve sustainability outcomes by empowering local decision makers to assess direct risks and benefits of sustainable practices to the local environment, economy, and culture.
environmental sciences,engineering, environmental
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The paper attempts to address the issues of sustainability and governance in the coffee supply chain. Specifically, the paper focuses on the following aspects: 1. **Economic, Social, and Environmental Impacts**: The paper explores how various sustainability initiatives affect the economic conditions of coffee producers, social well-being, and environmental quality. 2. **Diverse Sustainability Initiatives**: The paper systematically reviews the literature, identifying and categorizing 11 different types of sustainability initiatives led by various stakeholders (such as farmers, cooperatives, governments, businesses, etc.). 3. **Power Dynamics**: The paper analyzes the power relations in sustainability governance, particularly the power balance between upstream (e.g., businesses, governments) and downstream (e.g., farmers, cooperatives) participants. 4. **Research Bias**: The paper points out that existing research mainly focuses on the economic outcomes of certification programs, while relatively little research has been conducted on other types of sustainability initiatives and their social and environmental impacts. Through these analyses, the paper aims to provide a comprehensive perspective to help understand the roles and effects of different types of sustainability initiatives in the coffee supply chain and to offer guidance for future sustainability research.