Abstract:Introduction: The use of a sliding prosthesis in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with increased stress is an intermediate solution in primary surgery, between posteriorly stabilized prostheses and hinged prostheses, in cases of ligamentous laxity and/or loss of bone substance. Favorable results have been reported in the medium term but to our knowledge, this type of prosthesis has not been evaluated in Europe beyond 10 years of follow-up. We therefore conducted a retrospective study in order to carry out: 1) the study of the survival of the Legacy Constrained Condylar Knee (LCCK™) prosthesis in primary surgery, 2) the analysis of complications, functional scores and radiographic data, 3) the analysis of the link between the diaphyseal filling rate and prosthetic loosening. Hypothesis: The LCCK™ sliding prosthesis with increased constraint has equivalent long-term survival and clinical results to standard posteriorly stabilized TKA and superior to hinged TKA. Material and method: A retrospective series of 141 LCCK™ implanted in 134 patients between 1997 and 2010 was analyzed. Survival was assessed with censoring through an evaluation of partial or total revision of the implants. The functional results were evaluated using the IKS and Oxford 12 scores. Data regarding the Canal Fill Ratio (CFR) and the presence of pathological periprosthetic lines were also collected. Results: The average follow-up was 11.3±5.3years with a maximum follow-up of 22.7years. Survival at 20years was 90.8% [95% CI: 83.7-95.7]. The rate of early complications was 13.5% (19/141), predominantly comprised of venous thrombosis (6/141), hematomas (3/141 including two requiring surgical drainage), stiffness (3/141) and early infections (3/141). The rate of late complications was 17% (24/141), led by stiffness (4.4%; 6/141), infections (2.9%; 4/141) and hardware failure (2. 2%; 3/141). Ten of the 141 patients (7.1%) had LCCK failure, including 3 (2.1%) for stiffness, 3 (2.1%) for hardware failure, 2 (1.4%) for infection, 1 (0.7%) for laxity and 1 (0.7%) for a periprosthetic fracture. No aseptic loosening was found. The total IKS score went from 65 [0-116] to 143 [79-200] at follow-up, the IKS knee score went from 30 [0-66] to 85 [44-100], and the IKS function score went from 35 [0-70] to 57 [0-100]. The Oxford score went from 14 [2-25] to 34 [15-48] at follow-up. Only two patients (1.4%) presented with a partial periprosthetic line. The tibial CFR was 0.81 and the femoral CFR was 0.76. The influence of the CFR could not be analyzed due to the absence of loosening. Discussion: The LCCK™ prosthesis in primary surgery has good medium-term survival, a significant improvement in functional scores and a complication rate comparable to posteriorly stabilized prostheses. The complication rate is lower than that of hinged prostheses. Level of evidence: IV; single-center retrospective study.

Clinical outcome and survival rate of condylar constrained knee prosthesis in revision total knee arthroplasty: an average nine point six year follow-up

Results of A Second-Generation Constrained Condylar Prosthesis in Complex Primary and Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Mean 5.5-Year Follow-Up

Long-Term Effectiveness of Total Hip Replacement with the Collum Femoris Preserving Prosthesis

Clinical and Radiographic Results of Total Hip Arthroplasty with Collum Femoris Preserving Prosthesis:an over 5 Years Follow Up

Good Short-Term Survivorship of Constrained Condylar Revision Knee Implants With Medial Pivot Kinematics: A Level IV Retrospective Study

Satisfactory mid-term outcomes of condylar-constrained knee implants in primary total knee arthroplasty: clinical and radiological follow-up

Total hip arthroplasties in 190 cases: follow-up study]

The 10-Year Outcomes of the ASR XL Acetabular System: a Single-Center Experience from China.

Long-term results (after a mean 11.3years, and up to 22years, of follow-up) of the Legacy Constrained Condylar Knee (LCCK™) in primary total knee arthroplasty

[Revision Hip Arthroplasty with the Cementless Prosthesis: 4 Years Follow-Up Study].

Preliminary outcomes following revision total knee arthroplasty using a new fixed-bearing revision knee system in Asians: a mean of 3-year follow-up

Survivorship and Patient Outcomes of Conforming Bearings in Modern Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: Mean 3.5 Year Follow-Up

Long-term follow-up and survivorship of single-radius, posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty

Does the Cementless, Hydroxyapatite on Porous, Long-stem Prosthesis Perform Well in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty? A Multicenter Observation.

Total knee arthroplasty using a cemented single-radius, condylar-stabilized design performed without posterior cruciate ligament sacrifice

Revision total knee arthroplasty for flexion instability : a concise follow-up of a previous report

A high-flexion design total knee prosthesis: a ten to twelve-year follow-up study

Excellent results of restricted kinematic alignment total knee arthroplasty at a minimum of 10 years of follow‐up

Medium-term results of using TC-Dynamic posterior stabilized knee prosthesis: over 5 years follow up

No Discernible Difference in Revision Rate or Survivorship Between Posterior Cruciate-Retaining and Posterior Cruciate-Substituting TKA

High Rates of Early Septic Failure, But Low Rates of Aseptic Loosening after Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty with Contemporary Rotating-Hinge Prostheses