Abstract:Structural firefighters are exposed to a complex set of contaminants and combustion byproducts, including volatile organic compounds (VOCs). Additionally, recent studies have found structural firefighters' skin may be exposed to multiple chemical compounds via permeation or penetration of chemical byproducts through or around personal protective equipment (PPE). This mannequin-based study evaluated the effectiveness of four different PPE conditions with varying contamination control measures (incorporating PPE interface design features and particulate blocking materials) to protect against ingress of several VOCs in a smoke exposure chamber. We also investigated the effectiveness of long-sleeve base layer clothing to provide additional protection against skin contamination. Outside gear air concentrations were measured from within the smoke exposure chamber at the breathing zone, abdomen, and thigh heights. Personal air concentrations were collected from mannequins under PPE at the same general heights and under the base layer at abdomen and thigh heights. Sampled contaminants included benzene, toluene, styrene, and naphthalene. Results suggest that VOCs can readily penetrate the ensembles. Workplace protection factors (WPFs) were near one for benzene and toluene and increased with increasing molecular weight of the contaminants. WPFs were generally lower under hoods and jackets compared to under pants. For all PPE conditions, the pants appeared to provide the greatest overall protection against ingress of VOCs, but this may be due in part to the lower air concentrations toward the floor (and cuffs of pants) relative to the thigh-height outside gear concentrations used in calculating the WPFs. Providing added interface control measures and adding particulate-blocking materials appeared to provide a protective benefit against less-volatile chemicals, like naphthalene and styrene.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper attempts to solve is to evaluate the effectiveness of different firefighter personal protective equipment (PPE) interface control measures in preventing the penetration of volatile organic compounds (VOCs). Specifically, the research aims to: 1. **Evaluate the effects of different PPE configurations**: By using four different PPE conditions (standard PPE, interface - controlled PPE, enhanced interface - controlled PPE, one - piece liner PPE), study the effects of these configurations in preventing the penetration of VOCs such as benzene, toluene, styrene and naphthalene onto firefighters' skin. 2. **Analyze the penetration of VOCs**: In the smoke exposure chamber, measure the external air concentrations at different heights (breathing zone, abdomen, thigh) and compare them with the air concentrations at the corresponding positions inside the PPE to calculate the workplace protection factors (WPFs). 3. **Evaluate the additional protection of the base - layer clothing**: Study whether the base - layer clothing can provide additional protection and reduce the contact of VOCs with the skin. ### Research Background Structural firefighters are exposed to complex pollutants and combustion by - products in the fire scene environment, including polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and volatile organic compounds (VOCs). Some of these compounds are classified as known or possible carcinogens by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), such as benzene and styrene. In addition, studies have shown that firefighters' skin may be exposed to a variety of chemicals through the penetration or penetration of PPE. Therefore, evaluating the effectiveness of PPE is crucial for protecting the health of firefighters. ### Research Methods - **Experimental Design**: Use equipment simulating the fire environment (FES) to conduct four combustion experiments under controlled conditions, with 16 dummies (8 on each side) used in each experiment. - **Sampling Method**: Through active and passive air sampling techniques, collect samples outside and inside the PPE respectively to evaluate the penetration of VOCs. - **Data Processing**: Calculate the workplace protection factors (WPFs) and use statistical software for data analysis. ### Main Findings - **Penetration of VOCs**: The study found that VOCs can easily penetrate PPE. For benzene and toluene, the WPFs are close to 1, indicating that these compounds are hardly protected by PPE. For compounds with larger molecular weights (such as naphthalene and styrene), the WPFs are higher, indicating that PPE has a better protection effect on these compounds. - **Effects of Different PPE Configurations**: Under all PPE conditions, pants provide the best protection effect, especially in preventing the penetration of VOCs. Increasing interface control measures and adding particle - blocking materials seem to have a protective effect on reducing the penetration of low - volatile chemicals such as naphthalene and styrene. - **Role of Base - layer Clothing**: The base - layer clothing has no obvious effect on reducing the penetration of benzene, toluene and styrene, but has a certain protective effect on reducing the penetration of naphthalene. ### Conclusion This study provides a scientific basis for improving the design of firefighters' PPE, especially for the interface control measures to prevent the penetration of VOCs. These findings are helpful to guide the research and development of PPE, so that firefighters can be better protected in the fire scene environment.

Evaluating workplace protection factors (WPFs) of different firefighter PPE interface control measures for select volatile organic compounds (VOCs)

Evaluating Exposure to VOCs and Naphthalene for Firefighters Wearing Different PPE Configurations through Measures in Air, Exhaled Breath, and Urine

Characterizing exposure to benzene, toluene, and naphthalene in firefighters wearing different types of new or laundered PPE

The role of personal protective equipment (PPE) in reducing firefighter exposure to chemical hazards: A systematic review

Firefighters’ urinary concentrations of VOC metabolites after controlled-residential and training fire responses

Flame retardants, dioxins, and furans in air and on firefighters' protective ensembles during controlled residential firefighting

Characterising the Exposure of Australian Firefighters to Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons Generated in Simulated Compartment Fires

Assessing Decontamination and Laundering Processes for the Removal of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons and Flame Retardants from Firefighting Uniforms

Toward the future of firefighter gear: Assessing fluorinated and non-fluorinated outer shells following simulated on-the-job exposures

Firefighters’ absorption of PAHs and VOCs during controlled residential fires by job assignment and fire attack tactic

Effects of firefighting hood design, laundering and doffing on smoke protection, heat stress and wearability

Occupational Exposure of On-Shift Ottawa Firefighters to Flame Retardants and Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons

Off-Gassing of Semi-Volatile Organic Compounds from Fire-Fighters' Uniforms in Private Vehicles-A Pilot Study.

PFAS emissions from functional textiles using micro-chamber and thermal desorption coupled to two-dimensional gas chromatography-time of flight mass spectrometry (TD-GC×GC-TOF MS)

Another Pathway for Firefighter Exposure to Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances: Firefighter Textiles

Biomonitoring in firefighters for volatile organic compounds, semivolatile organic compounds, persistent organic pollutants, and metals: A systematic review

Percutaneous Absorption of Fireground Contaminants: Naphthalene, Phenanthrene, and Benzo[a]pyrene in Porcine Skin in an Artificial Sweat Vehicle

Characterizing firefighter's exposure to over 130 SVOCs using silicone wristbands: A pilot study comparing on-duty and off-duty exposures

Impact of Skin Decontamination Wipe Solutions on the Percutaneous Absorption of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons

Exposure to metals and semivolatile organic compounds in Australian fire stations.

A field investigation of 3 masks proposed as respiratory protection for wildland firefighters: a randomized controlled trial in British Columbia, Canada