P410 Intraoperative Ultrasonography of the Small Bowel in the evaluation of resection margins during surgery for Crohn's Disease

F Sacchetti,F Pizzolante,M Giambusso,C Nesci,D Giannarelli,F Galiandro,D Pugliese,F Scaldaferri,A E Potenza,L Sofo

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjad212.0540

2024-01-01

Journal of Crohn's and Colitis

Abstract:Abstract Background Histological involvement of surgical resection margins in Crohn’s Disease (CD) is considered an important risk factor for disease recurrence after surgery. The extent of resection is currently left to preoperative investigations and surgeon's experience. Aim of the study is to evaluate usefulness of intra-operative ultrasonography (IOUS) of the small bowel to best identify the surgical site of resection and reduce the risk of histological involvement of resection margins. Methods Consecutive patients who underwent surgery for CD (ileocaecal or ileal resections for first or repeated surgery) from April 2022 to April 2023 were prospectively enrolled (IOUS group). All patients underwent to IOUS through a small mini-laparotomy with a linear wireless probe performed by an expert gastroenterologist and the location of the proximal ileal resection was decided considering the absence of intraoperative small bowel ultrasonographic signs of CD (wall thickness, mucosal, submucosal and muscular layer thickness, echogenicity of the wall stratification and mesenteric fat). A control group from the historical cohort of patients undergoing the same surgical procedures was included; for whom the site of the proximal ileal resection was decided only on the basis of the absence of macroscopic signs of disease as usually assessed. To minimize the selection bias, a propensity score analysis was performed identifying a subgroup of the historical cohort (non-IOUS group) matched for location of disease and repeated surgery. The primary endpoint was histological involvement of the resection margins, judged positive in case of granulomas or signs of active ulcerative inflammation. Results 27 patients (59% male, mean age 39.3 y [SD 16.5], mean BMI 21.24 [SD 2.03]) were consecutively enrolled in the IOUS group. A 1:1 propensity score matching analysis was performed identifying 27 patients included in the non-IOUS group . The two groups were homogeneous in terms of gender, age, smoking, BMI, behavior of disease and surgical technique (laparoscopic or open technique). IOUS group presented a lower rate of histological positive margins compared to the non-IOUS group (18.5% vs 48.1% p = 0.021). No significant differences were found in terms of mean duration of surgery between the two groups (254.2 min vs 225 min [49.3-77.8]; p = 0.11) or in terms of mean length of surgical specimen (24.1 cm vs 34.1 cm [SD 13.5 -23.1]; p = 0.058) Conclusion IOUS of the small bowel appears to be a useful tool for IBD-surgeon in order to obtain a lower rate of histologically positive margins with a comparable duration of the surgery and no significant difference in length of the intestinal specimen.

gastroenterology & hepatology