Abstract:Introduction There is an expanding role for anesthesiologists in the preoperative optimization and postoperative management of patients, often in the context of a so-called perioperative surgical home. Such efforts typically include enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols and often an anesthesiologist-led team for perioperative management. Studies of the cost-effectiveness of such approaches have generally been conducted at single institutions, with most patients cared for by small numbers of surgeons. This limitation creates generalizability issues as to whether improvement was related mostly to organizational culture or the studied surgeons' practices (non-generalizable) versus the procedures (generalizable). We studied whether other organizations can rely on achieving similar benefits following the adoption of a studied process improvement strategy at a single institution. Methods All patients undergoing elective major therapeutic inpatient surgery discharged between October 2015 and June 2022 at non-federal hospitals in the state of Florida were included. For each discharge, the United States Medicare Severity Diagnosis-Related Group (MS-DRG) weighting factor (i.e., the multiplier for the hospital's base rate for admissions that determines reimbursement) and the Clinical Classification Software Refined (CCSR) code for the principal procedure were determined at admission and discharge from the state's inpatient healthcare database based on the diagnoses present at those time points. An increase in the weighting factor from admission to discharge represents societal costs from perioperative complications. Statewide, by hospital, and by surgeon, we calculated the total increase for each CCSR's weighting factor. Our primary hypothesis was that surgeon variability would be statistically greater than CCSR variability but that the incremental effect would be <5%. If CCSR and surgeon variability were comparable, this would be supportive of generalizability. In contrast, if there were a predominant effect related to the surgeon, results from one institution might not be applicable to others. Results Among the 1,482,344 discharges studied, the pooled (N=7 years) contributions to MS-DRG weighting factor increases from the upper 20% of surgeons were 2.8% more than from the upper 20% of CCSRs (95% CI 1.9%-3.9%, p=0.0006). Those CCSRs accounted for 85.5% (95% CI 79.4%-91.7%, p<0.0001) of the total increase in the MS-DRG weighting factor. The average contribution of the top two surgeons at each hospital to that hospital's increase in the weighting factor ranged among CCSRs from 68% to 97%. The median and 75th percentile of surgeons performing at least 10% of the total number of cases at each hospital was similar to those values for the contributions to the increases in the MS-DRG weighting factor, median 2.0 to 3.0, and 75th percentile 1.75 to 4.0. Conclusions Because variability among surgeons in their contributions to increases in the MS-DRG weighting factor only slightly exceeded the variability among CCSR surgical categories, perioperative surgical home and ERAS study research results involving single institutions and a small number of surgeons would likely be generalizable to other hospitals and healthcare systems. Funding agencies should not be hesitant to fund single-center perioperative surgical home studies and ERAS interventions based on concerns related to lack of generalizability.

Variation in day surgery Rates across Irish Public Hospitals

Identifying potentially low value surgical care: A national ecological study in England

Outpatient surgery benchmarks and practice variation patterns: Case controlled study

Re-engineering the operating room using variability methodology to improve health care value

Assessment of variation in 30-day mortality following cancer surgeries among older adults across US hospitals

Interrupted time series study for the impact of introduction of day surgery on hospital length of stay and expenses of laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Incremental Societal Costs of Perioperative Complications Following Adult Elective Inpatient Major Therapeutic Surgery in the State of Florida: A Seven-Year Retrospective Epidemiological Analysis

The development of one-day surgical care in Hungary between 2010 and 2019

Interhospital variability of risk-adjusted mortality rates and associated structural factors in patients undergoing emergency laparotomy: England and Wales population-level analysis

Mortality burden from variation in provision of surgical care in emergency general surgery: a cohort study using the National Inpatient Sample

Retrospective Analysis of Associated Costs and Sources of Variability in OR Utilization Across Weekdays

The predictors of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery utilization and practice variations in elective colorectal surgery: a provincial survey

An Audit of Operating Room Time Utilization in a Teaching Hospital: Is There a Place for Improvement?

The Successful Implementation of Day Case Tonsillectomy

Case study of the prediction of elective surgery durations in a New Zealand teaching hospital

Greater need but reduced access: a population study of planned and elective surgery rates in adult mental health service users

Variation in pediatric surgical care

Assessment of pre-, peri-, and post-surgical practices for elective colorectal patients in a model 4 hospital in Ireland

[Surgical suspensions, a quality factor in pediatric surgical patient care]

Association of day-case rates with post COVID-19 recovery of elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy activity across England

Using orthopaedic health care resources efficiently: A cost analysis of day surgery for unicompartmental knee replacement