Investigation of periodontitis, halitosis, xerostomia, and serological characteristics of patients with osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis and identification of new biomarkers

Yeon-Hee Lee,Seung-Jae Hong,Gi-Ja Lee,Seung-Il Shin,Ji-Youn Hong,Sang Wan Chung,Yeon-Ah Lee
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-55004-w
IF: 4.6
2024-02-22
Scientific Reports
Abstract:Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and osteoarthritis (OA) are two different types of arthritis. Within RA, the subsets between seronegative RA (snRA) and seropositive RA (spRA) represent distinct disease entities; however, identifying clear distinguishing markers between them remains a challenge. This study investigated and compared the oral health conditions in patients with RA and OA to clarify the differences from healthy controls. In addition, we investigated the serological characteristics of the patients, the factors that distinguished patients with RA from those with OA, and the main factors that differentiated between snRA and spRA patients. A total of 161 participants (mean age: 52.52 ± 14.57 years, 32 males and 129 females) were enrolled in this study and categorized as: normal (n = 33), OA (n = 31), and RA (n = 97). Patients with RA were divided into the following two subtypes: snRA (n = 18) and spRA (n = 79). Demographics, oral health, and serological characteristics of these patients were compared. The prevalence of periodontal diseases was significantly higher in patients with OA (100%) and RA (92.8%) than in healthy controls (0.0%). However, the presence of periodontal diseases was not utilized as a distinguishing factor between OA and RA. Xerostomia occurred more frequently in patients with RA (84.5%) than in patients with OA (3.2%) and healthy controls (0.0%) (all p < 0.001). ROC analysis revealed that periodontal disease was a very strong predictor in the diagnosis of OA compared to healthy controls, with an AUC value of 1.00 ( p < 0.001). Additionally, halitosis (AUC = 0.746, 95% CI 0.621–0.871, p < 0.001) and female sex (AUC = 0.663, 95% CI 0.529–0.797, p < 0.05) were also significant predictors of OA. The strongest predictors of RA diagnosis compared to healthy controls were periodontal diseases (AUC = 0.964), followed by xerostomia (AUC = 0.923), age (AUC = 0.923), female sex (AUC = 0.660), and halitosis (AUC = 0.615) (all p < 0.05). Significant serological predictors of RA were anti-CCP Ab (AUC = 0.808), and RF (AUC = 0.746) (all p < 0.05). In multiple logistic regression analysis, xerostomia (odds ratio, OR: 8124.88, 95% CI 10.37–6368261.97, p -value = 0.008) and Anti-CCP Ab (OR: 671.33, 95% CI 2.18–207,074.02, p = 0.026) were significant predictors for RA compared to OA. When diagnosing spRA compared to snRA, anti-CCP Ab (AUC = 1.000, p < 0.001) and RF (AUC = 0.910, 95%CI 0.854–0.967, p < 0.001) had outstanding predictive performances. Therefore, clinicians and researchers should thoroughly evaluate the oral status of both OA and RA patients, alongside serological factors, and consider these elements as potential predictors.
multidisciplinary sciences
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The main issues this paper attempts to address are: 1. **Distinguishing the oral health status of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and osteoarthritis (OA)**: The study aims to compare the incidence of periodontal disease, halitosis, and xerostomia in RA and OA patients and explore whether these oral health indicators can serve as markers to differentiate between the two types of arthritis. 2. **Identifying new biomarkers**: The study also seeks to find new biomarkers that can distinguish between seronegative rheumatoid arthritis (snRA) and seropositive rheumatoid arthritis (spRA), particularly through oral health and serological characteristics. Specifically, the study hypothesizes: - The decrease in salivary flow rate in RA patients will be more significant than in OA patients, and the resulting incidence of halitosis and periodontal disease will become important oral indicators to differentiate RA from OA. - There are oral health-related or serological biomarkers that can distinguish snRA from spRA. To test these hypotheses, researchers evaluated periodontal disease (including gingivitis and periodontitis), halitosis (measured by VSC), unstimulated whole salivary flow rate, and xerostomia in RA and OA patients and compared them with a healthy control group. Additionally, traditional serological markers (such as anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody (anti-CCP Ab), rheumatoid factor (RF), C-reactive protein (CRP), and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR)) were analyzed to further distinguish OA and RA patients as well as snRA and spRA subtypes.