Abstract:Background: Studies have highlighted common challenges and barriers to patient engagement in research, but most were based on patient partners' or academic researchers' experiences. A better understanding of how both groups differentially experience their partnership could help identify strategies to improve collaboration in patient engagement research. Aim: This study aimed to describe and compare patient partners' and academic researchers' experiences in patient engagement research. Methods: Based on a participatory approach, a descriptive qualitative study was conducted with patient partners and academic researchers who are involved in the PriCARE research programme in primary health care to examine their experience of patient engagement. Individual semi-structured interviews with patient partners (n = 7) and academic researchers (n = 15) were conducted. Academic researchers' interview verbatims, deidentified patient partners' summaries of their interviews and summaries of meetings with patient partners were analysed using inductive thematic analysis in collaboration with patient partners. Results: Patient partners and academic researchers' experiences with patient engagement are captured within four themes: (1) evolving relationships; (2) creating an environment that fosters patient engagement; (3) striking a balance; and (4) impact and value of patient engagement. Evolving relationships refers to how partnerships grew and improved over time with an acceptance of tensions and willingness to move beyond them, two-way communication and leadership of key team members. Creating an environment that fosters patient engagement requires appropriate structural support, such as clear descriptions of patient partner roles; adequate training for all team members; institutional guidance on patient engagement; regular and appropriate translation services; and financial assistance. For patient partners and academic researchers, striking a balance referred to the challenge of reconciling patient partners' interests and established research practices. Finally, both groups recognized the value and positive impact of patient engagement in the programme in terms of improving the relevance of research and the applicability of results. While patient partners and academic researchers identified similar challenges and strategies, their experiences of patient engagement differed according to their own backgrounds, motives and expectations. Conclusion: Both patient partners and academic researchers highlighted the importance of finding a balance between providing structure or guidelines for patient engagement, while allowing for flexibility along the way. Patient or public contribution: Patient partners from the PriCARE research programme were involved in the following aspects of the current study: (1) development of the research objectives; (2) planning of the research design; (3) development and validation of data collection tools (i.e., interview guides); (4) production of data (i.e., acted as interviewees); (5) validation of data analysis tools (code book); (6) analysis of qualitative data; and (7) drafting of the manuscript and contributing to other knowledge translation activities, such as conference presentations and the creation of a short animated video.

Patient Experiences and Perceptions of Care Coordination in Primary Care

Care Coordination in Primary Care: Views of Clinicians and Clinic Leaders

Sustainable care coordination: a qualitative study of primary care provider, administrator, and insurer perspectives

Care coordination across health care and social services sectors: patient and provider perspectives

Rethinking Care Coordination: Paradigm Shifting From Volume to Value

Care coordination for chronic and complex health conditions: An experienced based co-design study engaging consumer and clinician groups for service improvement

Patient- and Family-Centered Care Coordination: A Framework for Integrating Care for Children and Youth Across Multiple Systems

A Failure to Communicate: A Qualitative Exploration of Care Coordination Between Hospitalists and Primary Care Providers Around Patient Hospitalizations

Coordination of Care Could Improve: Canadian Results from the Commonwealth Fund International Health Policy Survey of Primary Care Physicians

Caregiver Experiences of Care Coordination for Recently Discharged Patients: A Qualitative Metasynthesis

Patient reports of cancer care coordination in rural Hawaii

Care coordination for CSHCN: associations with family-provider relations and family/child outcomes

Patients' experiences of and roles in interprofessional collaborative practice in primary care: a constructivist grounded theory study

Patient, family member and caregiver engagement in shaping policy for primary health care teams in three Canadian Provinces

Evaluation of interprofessional relational coordination and patients’ perception of care in outpatient oncology teams

Development and psychometric evaluation of a questionnaire to measure cancer patients' perception of care coordination

Informing understanding of coordination of care for patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a secondary qualitative analysis

Care coordination for older people in England: Does context shape approach?

Patient Preferences for Discussing and Acting on Health-Related Needs in Primary Care

Partners in Care: Consumer Experiences With Professional Services

Patient and researcher experiences of patient engagement in primary care health care research: A participatory qualitative study