Clinical utility of maternal TORCH screening in fetal growth restriction: A retrospective two‐centre study

Christine A. Wade,Naomi Atkinson,Natasha E. Holmes,Lisa Hui
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ajo.13802
2024-02-22
Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
Abstract:Objective The aim of this study was to evaluate the indications for maternal TORCH ( Toxoplasma gondii , rubella, cytomegalovirus (CMV), and herpes simplex virus (HSV)) serology, with a focus on the yield in isolated fetal growth restriction (FGR). Materials and Methods A retrospective review of antenatal TORCH testing between January 2014 and December 2018 was carried out at two hospitals in Melbourne, Australia. TORCH testing ordered for pregnancy losses and stillbirth was excluded. Results Medical records of 718 pregnancies were reviewed, representing 760 fetuses. Isolated FGR was the indication for TORCH screening in 71.2% of pregnancies. Screens ordered for isolated FGR were positive in 7.4% (95% CI 5.5–10.0%). There were 49 positive maternal immunoglobulin M (CMV = 34, Toxoplasma = 15). Two acute maternal infections during pregnancy were diagnosed (CMV = 1, Toxoplasma = 1), with both screens ordered to assess symptomatic maternal illness. There was one neonatal CMV infection, born to a woman with symptomatic primary CMV. No maternal or neonatal rubella or HSV infections were identified. We found a diagnostic yield of TORCH screening for isolated FGR of 0.0% (95% CI 0.00–0.8%). An estimated AUD$64 269.75 was expended on maternal TORCH screens in this study. Conclusion Maternal TORCH testing for isolated FGR is of no diagnostic yield and should be abandoned.
obstetrics & gynecology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?