Abstract:How do carers know what is right for their patient? What can they do further to relying on the two pillars of knowledge and ethics? Knowledge foregrounds rational decision-making based on scientific evidence. It allows cost-benefit rationalization and the choice of the best feasible objective. The steady advance of medical science drives responsible carers to keep their knowledge and skills up-to-date. Bioethics grants primary attention to the prevention of causing harm in general, to pursuant of patients' subjective wellbeing and to allow the latter enjoy their autonomy and to guarantee them the sense of justice. There are, however, cases where these values collide and any care decision violates one principle or another. How are carers expected to act then? This article concerns the choices made by carers, as presented and discussed in two cases. These cases deal with a clash between two principles: parenthood vs. fertility, religious rite vs. social affiliation. This class has generated an ethical dilemma. In each case carers try to justify their choices by expert knowledge and other ethical values, but later reflection reveals that the predominant element in 'solving' these dilemmas was "emotions." Professional training submits that: 'Set aside feelings in order to keep your thinking 'straight.' However, reality proves this simply infeasible. The more complex the medical-ethical situation, it is more likely that "emotions" take over. We have no choice as responsible carers but to allow our emotions the status of a factor of influence in their own right. Nowadays, a basic medical training for doctors and nurses offers an integrated body of knowledge and therapeutic skills. In addition, trainees are introduced to bioethics, supposedly sufficient to guide their future steps in their chosen profession. But how does this training in fact shape their future ethical conduct, if at all? How does it affect their ability to maintain ethical responsibility throughout therapeutic interactions? Perhaps there are other factors which govern the individual's conduct and his/her ethical responsibility? Simulation exercises were conducted, designed to induce healthcare professionals to reflect on the ethics of their own decision-making. The results demonstrated that therapeutic skills and familiarity with bioethical principles are not the sole factors governing the individual's ethical conduct. It turns out that emotions and feelings play a key part; this at once raises the question as to whether a medical training for doctors and nurses, in its current format, concerns itself with emotions and with how emotions shape a therapeutic personality. If not, then our training designers have food for thought. How can such training make trainees more aware of the power of their emotions? And, what are the ramifications on daily practice concerning ethical responsibility? Another question concerns the possible proper methods for mastering the theoretical materials and the practical techniques that promote emotional self-development?

Physicians have feelings: illuminating the relationship between emotional valence, clinical reasoning and context specificity

Clinical reasoning performance assessment: using situated cognition theory as a conceptual framework

Examining the Influence of Context and Professional Culture on Clinical Reasoning Through Rhetorical-Narrative Analysis

Cooperative versus competitive influences of emotion and cognition on decision making: A primer for psychiatry research

Emotions and identity in the figured world of becoming a doctor

Emotionally evocative patients in the emergency department: a mixed methods investigation of providers' reported emotions and implications for patient safety

Clinical reasoning in real-world practice: a primer for medical trainees and practitioners

Medicine, emotience, and reason

The inseparability of context and clinical reasoning

The place for emotions in professional carers' thinking: reflections on two cases

The influence of context on diagnostic reasoning: A narrative synthesis of experimental findings

Is "No News is Good News" Enough? A Thematic Analysis Exploring Clinical Reasoning Assessment in Pediatric Residency Programs

Reflection revisited: how physicians conceptualize and experience reflection in professional practice - a qualitative study

The impact of clinical context on the recognition of facial expressions

Emotional Context Effects on the Rating of Ambiguous Facial Expressions in Depression and Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorders

Understanding cultural dynamics shaping clinical reasoning skills: A dialogical exploration

How clinical decision tasks modulate emotional related EEG responses in nursing students

Clinical empathy as emotional labor in the patient-physician relationship

Syncing Our Global Thinking: A Framework for Contextualized Clinical Reasoning

Is there evidence that emotional reasoning processing underlies emotional disorders in adults? A systematic review

Exploring context and culture in clinical reasoning medical education: A qualitative exploratory study