Abstract:Abstract Background Multimode adhesives incorporate the versatility of adapting to various clinical situations by its capacity to be used in different protocols. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical behavior of composite resin direct restorations (Class I and II) performed with different universal dentin adhesive application protocols comparing adapted FDI and adapted USPHS criteria. Methods The current study is a randomized, double-blind, split-mouth, and convenience sample controlled clinical trial. The participants (age ≥ 18 years) had restorative need of Class I and/or II due to the presence of carious lesions and/or unsatisfactory restorations in at least three dental elements. Each participant received three application protocols for Scotchbond Universal adhesive (3M ESPE), one in each tooth to be restored: ER = etch-and-rinse + adhesive (n = 50); SEE = selective enamel etch + adhesive (n = 50) and SE = self-etch adhesive (n = 50). All teeth were restored in a similar way using FiltekTM Supreme composite resin (3M ESPE). Restorations were evaluated using the adapted FDI and adapted USPHS criteria, at baseline after 7 to 21 (12.02 ± 5.68) days (T1; n = 50 per group) and after 12 to 20 (15.8 ± 2.7) months (T2; n = 46 per group) by two previously calibrated evaluators (Kappa > 0.80). The statistical tests were performed between groups (Friedman), intragroup (Wilcoxon), and between the criteria considering acceptable and not acceptable restorations (McNemar), α = 0.05. Results A statistically significant difference was observed only for the property “superficial staining”, between groups at T2 ( p = 0.01) for ER (n = 13 with score 2 or more) and SEE (n = 3 with score 2 or more) and intragroup for ER (T1, n = 1 with score 2 or more; T2, n = 13 with score 2 or more, p = 0.001) and SE (T1, n = 0 with score 2 or more; T2, n = 8 with score 2 or more p = 0.007). For the other comparisons between groups, intragroup, and between the adapted FDI and adapted USPHS criteria, there were no statistically significant differences ( p ≥ 0.05). Conclusions It can be concluded that the different application protocols of the universal adhesive resulted in clinically “acceptable” restorations after 15.8 ± 2.7 months of follow-up. Adapted FDI and adapted USPHS criteria provided similar results to each other. Trial registration. Number in Brazilian Registry of Clinical Trials (ReBEC): RBR-9p3hdp. Registered 24 May 2015.

Re-evaluating the role of moist dentin of adhesive systems used in the etch-and-rinse bonding strategy. A systematic review and meta-analysis

Clinical evaluation of posterior restorations over wet and dry dentin using an etch-and-rinse adhesive: A 36-month randomized clinical trial

Clinical performance of posterior restorations using a universal adhesive over moist and dry dentin: A 36-month double-blind split-mouth randomized clinical trial

Bonding Quality of Etch-and-Rinse Adhesives in Root Canals Upon Different Pretreatments.

Influence of different application protocols of universal adhesive system on the clinical behavior of Class I and II restorations of composite resin – a randomized and double-blind controlled clinical trial

Effect of different adhesive systems on dental defects and sensitivity to teeth in composite resin restoration: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Dentin bond optimization using the dimethyl sulfoxide-wet bonding strategy: A 2-year in vitro study

Influence of cavity disinfectant and adhesive systems on the bonding procedure in demineralized dentin - a one-year in vitro evaluation

Influence of bioceramic sealer residues on the adhesion interface with a universal adhesive in the etch-and-rinse strategy, based on the application protocol and evaluation time

Sealing of pulp chamber dentin in endodontics: Influence of bond strategy and time-point application

Adhesive systems: important aspects related to their composition and clinical use

Effect of Dimethyl Sulfoxide wet bonding technique on the durability of resin-dentin bond of an etch-and rinse adhesive system under in-vivo simulating conditions

Correlation between bond strength and nanomechanical properties of adhesive interface

Longitudinal bond strength of a universal adhesive and chemical dentin characterization under different acid etching protocols

Influence of the use of chelating agents as final irrigant on the push-out bond strength of epoxy resin-based root canal sealers: A systematic review.

Impact of functional monomers, bioactive particles, and HEMA, on the adhesive performance of self-etch adhesive systems applied to simulated altered dentin

Evaluating the advancements in a recently introduced universal adhesive compared to its predecessor

Influence of adhesive systems containing different functional monomers on the longevity of bond strength at different dentin depths

To etch or not to etch, Part II: On the hydrophobic-rich content and fatigue strength of universal adhesives

SEALING OF BONDED RESIN COMPOSITE TO GINGIVAL WALL FOLLOWING APPLICATION OF TWO HEMOSTATIC AGENTS USING TWO ADHESIVE PROTOCOLS: AN INVITRO STUDY

Effect of Dentin Irrigants on Push-Out Bond Strength in Resin Cementation Protocols for Fiber Posts in Endodontically Treated Teeth: An In Vitro Study