A scalable spiking amygdala model that explains fear conditioning, extinction, renewal and generalization

Peter Duggins,Chris Eliasmith
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ejn.16338
IF: 3.698
2024-04-15
European Journal of Neuroscience
Abstract:Our spiking neuron model recreates the anatomical connectivity within amygdala and is trained using standard conditioning protocols. Through error‐driven synaptic plasticity, the model learns to associate conditioned stimuli with aversive stimuli and to suppress its defensive response in the extinction context. The model correctly predicts the magnitude of animal fear responses and overgeneralizes this response to similar stimuli when neural tuning curves induce weak pattern separation. The amygdala (AMY) is widely implicated in fear learning and fear behaviour, but it remains unclear how the many biological components present within AMY interact to achieve these abilities. Building on previous work, we hypothesize that individual AMY nuclei represent different quantities and that fear conditioning arises from error‐driven learning on the synapses between AMY nuclei. We present a computational model of AMY that (a) recreates the divisions and connections between AMY nuclei and their constituent pyramidal and inhibitory neurons; (b) accommodates scalable high‐dimensional representations of external stimuli; (c) learns to associate complex stimuli with the presence (or absence) of an aversive stimulus; (d) preserves feature information when mapping inputs to salience estimates, such that these estimates generalize to similar stimuli; and (e) induces a diverse profile of neural responses within each nucleus. Our model predicts (1) defensive responses and neural activities in several experimental conditions, (2) the consequence of artificially ablating particular nuclei and (3) the tendency to generalize defensive responses to novel stimuli. We test these predictions by comparing model outputs to neural and behavioural data from animals and humans. Despite the relative simplicity of our model, we find significant overlap between simulated and empirical data, which supports our claim that the model captures many of the neural mechanisms that support fear conditioning. We conclude by comparing our model to other computational models and by characterizing the theoretical relationship between pattern separation and fear generalization in healthy versus anxious individuals.
neurosciences
What problem does this paper attempt to address?