Systematic low bias of passive samplers in characterizing nitrogen isotopic composition of atmospheric ammonia

Yuepeng Pan,Mengna Gu,Linlin Song,Shili Tian,Dianming Wu,Wendell W. Walters,Xingna Yu,Xuemei Lü,Xue Ni,Yanjun Wang,Jing Cao,Xuejun Liu,Yunting Fang,Yuesi Wang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2020.105018

IF: 5.965

2020-10-01

Atmospheric Research

Abstract:<p>Identifying the sources of increased ammonia (NH₃) in the atmosphere has important implications for air quality, ecosystems, and climate. While analysis of the nitrogen isotopic composition (δ¹⁵N) can aid in the apportionment of NH₃ emission sources, the widely-used passive collection methods have not been verified for their ability to accurately characterize δ¹⁵N-NH₃. In this study, three types of passive samplers (ALPHA, Analyst, and Radiello) were employed and collocated with a denuder based active sampler (DELTA, serves as a reference method) to compare and contrast their ability in collecting atmospheric NH₃ for subsequent concentration and δ¹⁵N-NH₃ analysis in urban Beijing during the summer of 2018. The results showed that NH₃ concentrations determined using passive collection samplers that included ALPHA (<em>n</em> = 11), Analyst (<em>n</em> = 12), and Radiello (<em>n</em> = 7) samplers were 13.4%, 14.4%, and 27.5% lower than that of the active sampler (<em>n</em> = 12), respectively. The low NH₃ concentration bias in the passive collection samplers was suggested to be the result of inaccurate effective sampling rates due to incorrect mass transfer correction factors for the environmental conditions of this study. The δ¹⁵N-NH₃ values did not show significant differences between passive samplers, with weekly means of −31.0 ± 1.0‰ (<em>n</em> = 4), −28.4 ± 5.5‰ (<em>n</em> = 4), and − 29.1 ± 0.9‰ (<em>n</em> = 4) for the ALPHA, Analyst, and Radiello, respectively. Notably, the overall mean δ¹⁵N-NH₃ values collected by these passive samplers (−29.5 ± 3.2‰, <em>n</em> = 12) was significantly lower than that of the active sampler (−14.1 ± 1.6‰, <em>n</em> = 4), with a difference of 15.4 ± 3.5‰. The large underestimation of δ¹⁵N-NH₃ values by passive samplers can be explained by the diffusive isotope fractionation of NH₃ isotopologues, which is driven by relative mass differences of ¹⁴NH₃ and ¹⁵NH₃. Overall, these findings highlight a potential low bias in NH₃ concentrations and a substantial uncertainty in previous source interpretation using δ¹⁵N-NH₃ as previous studies have almost exclusively characterized δ¹⁵N-NH₃ using passive samplers. We suggest that the denuder-based active sampler should be used in the future for characterizing δ¹⁵N-NH₃ whether at the source or in an atmospheric environment with mixed sources. This work also has important implications for characterizing δ¹⁵N of other gaseous nitrogen compounds.</p>

meteorology & atmospheric sciences

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper attempts to solve is to evaluate the accuracy of passive samplers in characterizing the nitrogen isotope composition ($\delta^{15}$N - NH₃) of atmospheric ammonia (NH₃). Specifically, the study aims to compare the capabilities of three types of passive samplers (ALPHA, Analyst, and Radiello) with an active sampler based on a scrubber (DELTA) in collecting atmospheric NH₃ concentrations and $\delta^{15}$N - NH₃ values. The main questions in the study are:

1. **Can passive samplers accurately measure the NH₃ concentration in the atmosphere?**
- The study found that the NH₃ concentrations measured by passive samplers are generally lower than those measured by active samplers. Specifically, the NH₃ concentrations measured by the ALPHA, Analyst, and Radiello samplers are 13.4%, 14.4%, and 27.5% lower than those measured by the active sampler, respectively.

2. **Are there systematic biases in passive samplers when characterizing $\delta^{15}$N - NH₃ values?**
- The research results show that the $\delta^{15}$N - NH₃ values measured by passive samplers are significantly lower than those measured by active samplers, with an average difference of 15.4‰. This indicates that passive samplers have a diffusion isotope effect when collecting NH₃, resulting in the preferential collection of ¹⁴NH₃ relative to ¹⁵NH₃, thereby underestimating the $\delta^{15}$N - NH₃ values.

### Main Conclusions
- **Deviation in Concentration Measurement**: Passive samplers have a systematic underestimation when measuring NH₃ concentrations, which may be due to the inaccurate effective sampling rates provided by the manufacturers or the influence of environmental conditions.
- **Deviation in Isotope Values**: Passive samplers have a significant systematic deviation when characterizing $\delta^{15}$N - NH₃ values, mainly due to the preferential collection of ¹⁴NH₃ relative to ¹⁵NH₃ caused by the diffusion isotope effect.

### Significance
- **Impact on Source Apportionment**: The systematic biases of passive samplers may mislead the source apportionment of atmospheric NH₃ based on isotope mixing models, especially when quantifying sources with lower $\delta^{15}$N - NH₃ values (such as fertilizer volatilization).
- **Recommendations for Future Research**: It is recommended to use an active sampler based on a scrubber to characterize $\delta^{15}$N - NH₃ in future research, whether in emission source or mixed - source environments, in order to reduce the uncertainty of source apportionment.

### Formula Summary
- **Calculation Formula for NH₃ Concentration in Passive Samplers**:
\[
C=\frac{M\times10}{Q\times t}
\]
where \(C\) is the concentration of NH₃ in the atmosphere ($\mu g/m^{3}$), \(M\) is the mass of collected NH₃ ($\mu g$), \(Q\) is the passive sampling rate ($ml/min$), and \(t\) is the exposure time ($min$).

- **Calculation Formula for Isotope Ratio**:
\[
\delta^{15}N (\text{‰})=\left(\frac{\left(\frac{^{15}N}{^{14}N}\right)_{\text{sample}}}{\left(\frac{^{15}N}{^{14}N}\right)_{\text{standard}}}-1\right)\times1000
\]

- **Calculation Formula for Diffusion Coefficient**:
\[
D(T, P)=D_0\times\left(\frac{T}{T_0}\right)^{1.81}\times\left(\frac{P_0}{P}\right)
\]
where \(D_0 = 0.1978 \, \text{cm}^2/\text{s}\) at \(P_0 = 1 \, \text{atm}\) and \(T_0 = 273.15 \, \text{K}\).

- **Calculation Formula for Diffusion Isotope Fractionation Constant**:
\[
\alpha'=\frac{D_{15}}{D_{14}}
\]
\[
\epsilon=\left(\frac{1}{\alpha'}-1\right)\times