Forensically relevant anatomical brain regions cannot be sub-differentiated by RNA expression analysis

Jan Euteneuer,Lucas Moitinho-Silva,Cornelius Courts
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12024-024-00787-7
2024-02-01
Forensic Science Medicine and Pathology
Abstract:The contextualization of biological traces generated by severe head injuries can be beneficial for criminal investigations. Here we aimed to identify and validate mRNA candidates for a robust sub-differentiation of forensically and traumatologically relevant brain regions. To this purpose, massively parallel sequencing of whole transcriptomes in sample material taken from four different areas of the cerebral cortex (frontal, temporal, parietal, occipital lobe) was performed, followed by bioinformatical data analysis, classification, and biostatistical candidate selection. Candidates were evaluated by Multiplex-RT-PCR and capillary electrophoresis. Only a weak relative upregulation and solely for candidates expressed in the parietal lobe was observed. Two candidates with upregulation in the cerebellar region (PVALB and CDR2L) were chosen for further investigation; however, PVALB could not reliably and repeatedly be detected in any lobe whereas CDR2L was detectable in all lobes. Consequently, we suggest that differences in mRNA expression between four regions of the cerebral cortex are too small and less pronounced to be useful for and applicable in forensic RNA analysis. We conclude that sub-differentiation of these brain regions via RNA expression analysis is generally not feasible within a forensic scope.
pathology,medicine, legal
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
This paper aims to explore the possibility of distinguishing different brain regions of forensic and traumatic significance through RNA expression analysis. Specifically, the researchers hope to identify and validate mRNA candidate markers that can robustly differentiate between four different cortical regions (frontal lobe, temporal lobe, parietal lobe, and occipital lobe) to support investigations in criminal cases, particularly in cases of severe head injuries. The research team employed large-scale parallel sequencing technology to sequence the whole transcriptome of these brain regions and conducted bioinformatics data analysis, classification, and statistical selection of candidate genes. However, the study results indicate that the differences in mRNA expression between these four cortical regions are very small, insufficient for forensic RNA analysis. Although some candidate genes were screened, their performance in actual detection was neither stable nor significant. Therefore, the authors ultimately conclude that, based on the current research data, distinguishing these specific brain regions through RNA expression analysis is not feasible in forensic practice.