Comparative outcomes in breast reconstruction: autologous techniques and long-term functionality
Thomas Norman Steele,Nicholas Till Haddock
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21037/gs-24-184
2024-09-03
Gland Surgery
Abstract:Thomas Norman Steele , Nicholas Till Haddock Department of Plastic Surgery, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA Comment on: Löfstrand J, Paganini A, Grimby-Ekman A, et al . Long-term patient-reported back and shoulder function after delayed breast reconstruction with a latissimus dorsi flap: case-control cohort study. Br J Surg 2024;111:znad296. Keywords: Breast reconstruction; autologous reconstruction; latissimus dorsi flap (LD flap); quality of life (QoL); deep inferior epigastric perforator flap (DIEP flap) Submitted May 21, 2024. Accepted for publication Aug 06, 2024. Published online Aug 22, 2024. doi: 10.21037/gs-24-184 Breast cancer is a prevalent condition, affecting one in eight women over their lifetime, according to the American Cancer Society (1). Approximately one-third of these women will undergo some form of mastectomy. While this procedure is crucial for treating breast cancer, it often results in a decreased sense of femininity and a reduced quality of life (QoL) for the patients (2). Breast reconstruction plays a vital role in improving the QoL, psychosocial wellbeing, sexual wellbeing, and overall confidence of these women (3). Among the various methods available, autologous reconstruction, which uses the patient's own tissue, is shown to significantly enhance QoL as measured by standardized patient-reported outcome measures such as the BREAST-Q, while also eliminating the risks associated with prosthetic implants (4). Autologous reconstruction can be broadly classified into pedicled and free tissue transfer methods. The latissimus dorsi (LD) myocutaneous flap, first described by Iginio Tansini in 1897, has been a cornerstone of pedicled flap techniques for over a century (5). It remains a reliable option, particularly for patients who have undergone radiation therapy. However, the primary concern with the LD flap is the associated donor site morbidity due to the sacrifice of the LD muscle, which is a powerful adductor, extensor, and internal rotator of the upper extremity (6,7). In response to these concerns, surgical techniques have evolved to include muscle-sparing approaches to reduce morbidity (8-10). Despite these advances, the traditional LD flap continues to be associated with significant functional impairments (11). In search of a more favorable donor site for breast reconstruction, the pedicled transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (TRAM) flap, introduced by Hartrampf et al. in 1982, was a pivotal development (12). This technique, which initially involved sacrificing the entire rectus abdominis muscle, had evolved into the free TRAM flap, but due to the frequency of postoperative abdominal hernia/bulge, the field progressed to the deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap, which preserves the rectus muscle by using only the perforating vessels from the deep inferior epigastric system. The DIEP flap, now considered the gold standard in autologous breast reconstruction, minimizes donor site morbidity while providing excellent reconstructive outcomes (13). Prior studies analyzing the functional outcomes of patients following LD flap breast reconstruction have been inconclusive, plagued by relatively short follow-up periods, and have not controlled for potential confounding factors such as chest/axillary surgery (e.g., axillary dissection), chest wall radiation therapy, age, and adjunct therapy. A 2014 systematic review included 22 studies involving 719 cases to evaluate changes in donor site functionality through various metrics like the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire, shoulder range of motion, and strength tests (14). The authors concluded that while most patients experience minimal functional impairment at the donor site, there are significant challenges during the early postoperative period. Some patients face long-term reductions in shoulder strength and functional limitations in sports and art-related activities, although daily activities remain largely unaffected. A more recent systematic review and meta-analysis from 2019 found that while there is significant impairment in shoulder flexibility and abduction in the short term (up to 3 months post-surgery), long-term effects vary, with some studies indicating persistent impairment while others show minimal long-term impact (15). Factors like age, smoking, obesity, radiotherapy, and the specific type of flap used were significant in influencing outcomes. To address a paucity of long-term outcomes, Löfstrand et al. conducted a single-institution retrospective observational case-control cohort study to evaluate patient-reported outcomes of back and shoulder function following delayed breast reconstruction using the LD flap compared to the DIEP flap (16). The study involved 135 patients who underwent LD flap reconstruction and 118 control patients who received DIEP flap reco -Abstract Truncated-
surgery