Abstract:Histological parameters were reappraised among 20 diandric triploid partial moles and 22 digynic triploid gestations. None of histological parameters were unique to either partial mole or digynic triploidy. Villous size, cistern, trophoblastic hyperplasia, and syncytiotrophoblast lacunae were more common in the partial hydatidiform mole (PHM). However, histological assessment was unable to classify 35% to 40% of PHM. Aims Diagnostic separation of diandric triploid gestation, i.e. partial mole from digynic triploid gestation, is clinically relevant, as the former may progress to postmolar gestational trophoblastic neoplasia. The aim of the study was to investigate if the combination of abnormal histology combined with ploidy analysis‐based triploidy is sufficient to accurately diagnose partial mole. Methods and Results A genotype–phenotype correlation study was undertaken to reappraise histological parameters among 20 diandric triploid gestations and 22 digynic triploid gestations of comparable patient age, gestational weeks, and clinical presentations. Two villous populations, irregular villous contours, pseudoinclusions, and syncytiotrophoblast knuckles, were common in both groups. Villous size ≥2.5 mm, cistern formation, trophoblastic hyperplasia, and syncytiotrophoblast lacunae were significantly more common in the partial hydatidiform mole. Cistern formation had the highest positive predictive value (PPV) (93%) and highest specificity (96%) for diandric triploid gestation, although the sensitivity was 70%. Cistern formation combined with villous size ≥2.5 mm or trophoblast hyperplasia or syncytiotrophoblast lacunae had 100% specificity and PPV, but a marginal sensitivity of 60%–65%. A moderate interobserver agreement (Kappa = 0.57, Gwet's AC1 = 0.59) was achieved among four observers who assigned diagnosis of diandric triploid gestation or digynic triploidy solely based on histology. Conclusions None of histological parameters are unique to either diandric triploid gestation or digynic triploid gestation. Cistern formation is the most powerful discriminator, with 93% PPV and 70% sensitivity for diandric triploid gestation. While cistern formation combined with either trophoblastic hyperplasia or villous size ≥2.5 mm or syncytiotrophoblast lacunae has 100% PPV and specificity for diandric triploid gestation, the sensitivity is only 60% to 65%. Therefore, in the presence of triploidy, histological assessment is unable to precisely classify 35% to 40% of diandric triploid gestations or partial moles.

Diandric triploid partial mole versus digynic nonmolar triploidy: is morphological assessment sufficient for the diagnostic distinction?

Morphology combined with HER2 D-DISH ploidy analysis to diagnose partial hydatidiform mole: an evaluation audit using molecular genotyping

Challenges in Diagnosing Hydatidiform Moles: a Review of Promising Molecular Biomarkers.

Analysis of Gestational Trophoblastic Disease by Genotyping and Chromosome in Situ Hybridization.

Novel scoring system provides high separation of diploidy and triploidy to aid partial hydatidiform mole diagnosis: an adaption of HER2 D-DISH for ploidy analysis

NLRP7 Mutations in Women with Diploid Androgenetic and Triploid Moles: a Proposed Mechanism for Mole Formation

Enhancing Clinicopathological Diagnosis of Hydatidiform Mole Through the Combined Application of Histomorphologic Analysis, Immunohistochemical Analysis of p57 Expression, and Short Tandem Repeat Typing Method

Hematoxylin and Eosin Staining Helps Reduce Maternal Contamination in Short Tandem Repeat Genotyping for Hydatidiform Mole Diagnosis.

Twin Pregnancy with Complete Hydatidiform Mole and Co-Existing Fetus: A Report of 15 Cases with a Clinicopathological Analysis and DNA Genotyping.

Histopathological features of hydatidiform moles and placenta changes of nonmolar miscarriage in early stage of pregnancy]

The diagnostic value of Ki-67, P53 and P63 in distinguishing partial Hydatidiform mole from hydropic abortion

Evaluation of Combined p57KIP2 Immunohistochemistry and Fluorescent in situ Hybridization Analysis for Hydatidiform Moles Compared with Genotyping Diagnosis

Application of P57 immunohistochemistry and CEP17 ploidy analysis in differential diagnosis of hydatidiform mole

Single‐nucleotide polymorphism array and fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis to decode the cytogenetic profile of atypical partial hydatidiform moles diagnosed by short tandem repeat polymorphism analysis

Twin/Multiple Gestations With a Hydatidiform Mole: Clinicopathologic Analysis of 21 Cases With Emphasis on Molecular Genotyping and Parental Contribution

STR DNA Genotyping of Hydatidiform Moles in South China.

Single Nucleotide Polymorphism-Based Microarray Analysis for the Diagnosis of Hydatidiform Moles

Twin pregnancy consisting of a complete hydatidiform mole and coexistent fetus: a clinicopathological analysis

[Clinical application of STR genotyping diagnosis for hydatidiform mole and nonmolar gestation]

Ultrasonographic signs of partial hydatidiform mole

Reappraisal and refined diagnosis of ultrasonography and histological findings for hydatidiform moles: a multicentre retrospective study of 821 patients